Jump to content

Should We Get Rotary Ac10?


No replies to this topic

Poll: RAC10 (16 member(s) have cast votes)

Should we get an RAC10?

  1. Yes, to your version (4 votes [25.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 25.00%

  2. Yes, for a different version (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  3. No (12 votes [75.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 75.00%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 The6thMessenger

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Nova Captain
  • Nova Captain
  • 8,101 posts
  • LocationFrom a distance in an Urbie with a HAG, delivering righteous fury to heretics.

Posted 01 July 2017 - 01:44 AM

View PostThe6thMessenger, on 29 June 2017 - 03:51 PM, said:

Quote

RAC2

Optimal Range: 540m
Max Range: 1080m
Damage/Shot: 1
Fire Interval: 0.115s
Burst DPS: 8.680555555555553
Burst Duration: 4s
Jam Duration: 6s
Effective DPS: 3.472222222222221
Ammo/Ton: 200

Quote

RAC5

Optimal Range: 450m
Max Range: 900m
Damage/Shot: 2
Fire Interval: 0.177s
Burst DPS: 11.28472222222222
Burst Duration: 5s
Jam Duration: 8s
Effective DPS: 4.340277777777776
Ammo/ton: 100

Quote

RAC10

Optimal Range: 360m
Max Range: 720m
Damage/Shot: 3.00
Fire Interval: 0.216s
Burst DPS: 13.88888888888889
Burst Duration: 6s
Jam Duration: 10s
Effective DPS: 5.208333333333333
Ammo/ton: 70


So here's an idea, what if we get an RAC10? It's not canon, but it would make the RACs more interesting, it would also give the RACs a sense of specialty. With the RAC2 as the long-range dakka, the RAC10 as the close-range pounder, and the RAC5 as the old-fashioned generalist.

My version is also meant to go to the rework i proposed.

Edited by The6thMessenger, 01 July 2017 - 01:45 AM.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users