Rac's Should Fire During Spool-Up
#1
Posted 02 July 2017 - 07:55 PM
I presume that the designers intend for this weapon to have limited utility for poking and snap shooting, so the initial ROF could be adjusted to achieve the desired initial effectiveness.
Firing during spool-up also pevents the possibility of macro abuse that a non-firing, non-jamming spool-up would invite.
#2
Posted 02 July 2017 - 09:07 PM
#3
Posted 02 July 2017 - 09:18 PM
It's a shame that they didn't just do this outright.
It's been a while since I last saw a game with anything similar to RACs having to spool up first. They normally have spooling up without firing as an alternative fire, which in MWO's case would maintain potential abuse.
It would also make more sense that the Jam bar starts on spool up.
In fact, they could make the Jam bar start slow and progressively speed up as the weapon spools up, ending at whatever speed the jam bar is intended to be at (which still seems ridiculously fast)
#4
Posted 02 July 2017 - 09:42 PM
Over all it even if it wasnt here its not macro abuse when you can do it by hand. I was doing it just fine without a macro until i saw the bar filling up.
Edited by Monkey Lover, 02 July 2017 - 10:01 PM.
#5
Posted 02 July 2017 - 10:29 PM
Monkey Lover, on 02 July 2017 - 09:42 PM, said:
You are correct, the current system is anti-macro. I brought up the macro issue because the fix to RAC's most often discussed is to not increment the jam bar while spooling up, making the system macro friendly, which is why some were arguing against it. I was simply pointing out that the solution I'm proposing avoids that whole argument.
#6
Posted 02 July 2017 - 10:39 PM
#7
Posted 02 July 2017 - 10:50 PM
But is suspect that they can't actually give a weapon a variable rate of fire. It's either firing with its full stats, or it's not firing at all. And that would mean the weapon has no spool-up time at all.
Which to me would be fine, because it's a questionable idea in the first place, and it's reducing the usability of the weapon further, on top of the drawbacks of needing to constantly face your enemy to deliver noteworthy damage. But obviously they wanted to have this mechanic.
#8
Posted 02 July 2017 - 10:53 PM
Midnight Camel, on 02 July 2017 - 10:29 PM, said:
You are correct, the current system is anti-macro. I brought up the macro issue because the fix to RAC's most often discussed is to not increment the jam bar while spooling up, making the system macro friendly, which is why some were arguing against it. I was simply pointing out that the solution I'm proposing avoids that whole argument.
Personally i would remove it make the spin up time even longer and put some skill into the weapon to keep it spinning. Hopefully this would allow for some buff to bad weapon.
I dont believe in the macro abuse
#9
Posted 02 July 2017 - 11:55 PM
Edited by LordNothing, 02 July 2017 - 11:56 PM.
#10
Posted 03 July 2017 - 12:06 AM
#11
Posted 03 July 2017 - 03:25 PM
MustrumRidcully, on 02 July 2017 - 10:50 PM, said:
But is suspect that they can't actually give a weapon a variable rate of fire. It's either firing with its full stats, or it's not firing at all.
That's possible but they didn't have a jam bar before this release either, so they seem to be willing to put in the coding work. Anyway, all we can do is make the best suggestions we can and hope PGI can see their way to implementing them.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users