22 replies to this topic

[Scout Derek]

6E but no Ballistics.

>Has MG quirk


well okay I'm done.

[Ced Riggs]

If only you could read.

[RC01-138]

Hes actually right. Zero ballistic spots and increased machine gun rof is absolutely stupid.

[Jay Leon Hart]

Quote

Please Note: Three of the Uziel variants shown in the images above possess incorrect Quirk assignments.
• Uziel UZL-3P is currently missing a -20% UAC Jam Chance Quirk.
• Uziel UZL-5P currently has a -20% UAC Jam Chance Quirk, but should have a 20% Machine Gun Rate of Fire Quirk instead.
• Uziel UZL-6P currently has a Machine Gun Rate of Fire Quirk, even though it has no Ballistic Hardpoints.

"LOL" indeed

[Ced Riggs]

RC01-138, on 15 July 2017 - 06:56 AM, said:

Hes actually right. Zero ballistic spots and increased machine gun rof is absolutely stupid.

If only you could read, too.

[Antares102]

Well played PGI well played.
Every patch needs some sort of easter egg.
But at least they already found it themselves.

Edited by Antares102, 15 July 2017 - 07:00 AM.

[Iron Heel]

Yes, an addendum to the notes is a by far superior fix..

Ah ha, ah ha ha ha, ahhh ewww

[Scout Derek]

Ced Riggs, on 15 July 2017 - 06:58 AM, said:

If only you could read, too.

even then,

this is a pretty bad mistake lol

Edited by Scout Derek, 15 July 2017 - 07:19 AM.

[Clownwarlord]

Actually I don't see whats funny about this ... it is more this ...



Thanks PGI never thought I would have a reason to use the triple face palm, but considering over the years the double has been used so much it finally got its chance to shine.

One facepalm for each quirk fail.

[Champion of Khorne Lord of Blood]

Iron Heel, on 15 July 2017 - 07:17 AM, said:

Yes, an addendum to the notes is a by far superior fix..

Ah ha, ah ha ha ha, ahhh ewww

Really makes me wonder why they'd add those quirk "bugs" into the patchnotes when they still have days to fix the small value changes. It takes not even an hour to make changes of this level.

[KodiakGW]

I'm actually looking forward to when they fix this. I only have the base pack, which has the 3P. 20% UAC jam, the changed 15% UAC jam removal (which should be more, would 20% total really make it OP!?), AND ESPECIALLY the fix to UAC jamming when the game thinks you are holding down the fire buttton. Probably the main reason why I'm seeing and documenting the double jams happening in my TBR-C with it's 20% UAC jam chance reduction from full Omnipod set. They don't happen as often in Testing Grounds as they do in live game.

[Archer Magnus]

Everyone, overreact!

[FupDup]

It's like that one Highlander variant all over again.

[JadePanther]

ponys have appeared on page one yep this thread has no value already.. To the outer reaches with it..

[Revis Volek]

Scout Derek, on 15 July 2017 - 07:19 AM, said:

even then,

this is a pretty bad mistake lol

Considering its the 3rd or 4th time they have done something like this...

Honestly whoever is in charge of this need to be talked to, you have created work numerous times for the rest of your team. I think its time for someone to get organized and get their head out of their own ac20.

Ced Riggs, on 15 July 2017 - 06:51 AM, said:

If only you could read.

lol

wut?


So you are ok with a mech with no B points getting MG quirks?

[Andi Nagasia]

as many have noticed the UZL has inproper Quirks,

InnerSphereNews, on 14 July 2017 - 07:08 PM, said:

• Uziel UZL-3P is currently missing a -20% UAC Jam Chance Quirk.
• Uziel UZL-5P currently has a -20% UAC Jam Chance Quirk, but should have a 20% Machine Gun Rate of Fire Quirk instead.
• Uziel UZL-6P currently has a Machine Gun Rate of Fire Quirk, even though it has no Ballistic Hardpoints.

i think most of their Quirks will be Hot Fixed in,

im hoping it gets CN9 Armor Quirks soon, given its size and shape, so im hopeful on Armor Quirks,

Edit-
Ha just noticed it looks like a accidental Copy Paste Accident,

Uziel UZL-3P is currently missing a -20% UAC Jam Chance Quirk.
(Why? because it was accidentally placed on the UZL-5P(which is right below on the List)

Uziel UZL-5P has a -20% UAC Jam Quirk, but should have a 20% Machine Gun ROF Quirk instead.
(Why? because it were accidentally placed, see UZL-3P & 6P(which is right above /Below on the List)

Uziel UZL-6P currently has a Machine Gun ROF Quirk, even though it has no Ballistic Hardpoints.
(Why? because it were accidentally placed, & belongs on the UZL-5P(which is right above on the List)

this is leading me to believe this was a accident brought on by a last minute Quirk Change,

Edited by Andi Nagasia, 16 July 2017 - 07:34 AM.

[Ced Riggs]

Revis Volek, on 16 July 2017 - 07:21 AM, said:

So you are ok with a mech with no B points getting MG quirks?

If only you could read aswell. PGI already posted that those messed up quirks are erroneous. Now you can decide not to read, take the already annotated picture and make a thread like this one about it, or you can read. The choice is yours. If you opt for the latter, I'mma riducule you.

Also, Andi, please remove that [Redacted], thanks.

Edited by draiocht, 16 July 2017 - 11:09 AM.
inappropriate language

[Revis Volek]

Ced Riggs, on 16 July 2017 - 07:25 AM, said:

If only you could read aswell. PGI already posted that those messed up quirks are erroneous. Now you can decide not to read, take the already annotated picture and make a thread like this one about it, or you can read. The choice is yours. If you opt for the latter, I'mma riducule you.

Also, Andi, please remove that [Redacted], thanks.

How hard is it to photoshop out that quirk, it would take 3 mins of their life and be accurate.


They dont even need to do that, if they just took a screenshot of the mech with the quirks accurate, like they claim it is, then it would be a non issue.


Its lazy AF and just is another example of minimum effort put into this game and your gonna ridicule (not sure what you meant since you cant spell) me? Is that suppose to be a threat? because oh boy im so scared i dont know what to do, whats next navy seal copypasta?

your such an internet tough guy, im shaking.

Edited by draiocht, 16 July 2017 - 11:09 AM.
Quote Clean-Up

[Ced Riggs]

Revis Volek, on 16 July 2017 - 07:51 AM, said:

Its lazy AF

It sure is. You are absolutely correct here - it's quite sad that the screenshot isn't corrected, but, a written addendum is posted.

Revis Volek, on 16 July 2017 - 07:51 AM, said:

[...] your gonna ridicule (not sure what you meant since you cant spell) me? Is that suppose to be a threat? because oh boy im so scared i dont know what to do, whats next navy seal copypasta?

your such an internet tough guy, im shaking.

You see, if you want to make fun of a single typo, maybe you shouldn't make fifteen consecutive grammar mistakes in the span of three sentences yourself. Ad hominem based on spelling as a response to something that agitates you only undermines your position. You asked for explanation, and I provided. I fail to see how that makes me an internet tough guy - or how laughing about someone even elicits such an assumption - but who am I to disturb your head canon.

Edited by Ced Riggs, 16 July 2017 - 08:18 AM.

[Revis Volek]

Ced Riggs, on 16 July 2017 - 08:17 AM, said:

It sure is. You are absolutely correct here - it's quite sad that the screenshot isn't corrected, but, a written addendum is posted.


You see, if you want to make fun of a single typo, maybe you shouldn't make fifteen consecutive grammar mistakes in the span of three sentences yourself. Ad hominem based on spelling as a response to something that agitates you only undermines your position. You asked for explanation, and I provided. I fail to see how that makes me an internet tough guy - or how laughing about someone even elicits such an assumption - but who am I to disturb your head canon.

Kewl Starry bra....



Got more? Im here all day Internet tough guy.








Who's agitated? I didn't know what you were gonna do to me and I wanted to make sure when I called for help I could explain my starry. I told you i'm so scared of this mechseal mode you are going on.


Help me Tom Cruise.

Edited by Revis Volek, 16 July 2017 - 08:27 AM.