"i'm So Embarrassed" Or Why Does My 90 Ton Killing Machine Look So Silly?
#1
Posted 18 July 2017 - 04:08 PM
I'm not sure if the mech should feel humiliated, if I should, or whomever is responsible for the final modeling. But, I'm sorry, a mech should not be easily confused with Peter F***ing Cottontail hopping along the bunny trail; and yet here we are.
#2
Posted 18 July 2017 - 04:11 PM
#3
Posted 18 July 2017 - 04:11 PM
#7
Posted 18 July 2017 - 04:18 PM
#8
Posted 18 July 2017 - 04:21 PM
Bud Crue, on 18 July 2017 - 04:08 PM, said:
I'm not sure if the mech should feel humiliated, if I should, or whomever is responsible for the final modeling. But, I'm sorry, a mech should not be easily confused with Peter F***ing Cottontail hopping along the bunny trail; and yet here we are.
Cuz it was built by a bunch or Clam Merchants and Lawyers? So nyaw nyaw! Clams Drool! IS RULE!
But seriously... they couldn't have screwed that poor thing up much worse if they had intentionally tried to do it to spite Impy.
#9
Posted 18 July 2017 - 04:23 PM
Bishop Steiner, on 18 July 2017 - 04:21 PM, said:
Maybe it's a sneaky way of trying to troll Imperius? That's the best and only justification I can think of.
#11
Posted 18 July 2017 - 04:27 PM
FupDup, on 18 July 2017 - 04:23 PM, said:
the thought did cross my mind, not gonna lie. I could see Russ being a tad vindictive, lol.
But naw, if it was intentional trolling they would have released a Gold version.....
Deathlike, on 18 July 2017 - 04:25 PM, said:
So... thanks Imperius?
I mean, arriving at below minimally viable is a serious achievement. The bar has been lowered!
Yeah. Well, I've said my piece about these mechs. I did my part to get the K2 fixed, somehow got my K9 in, etc... so I ain't gonna push it. Someone else can lead this crusade.
Besides... last time I pushed for something we ended up with Volumetric Scaling. I know, I know, you can thank me later.
#12
Posted 18 July 2017 - 04:27 PM
FupDup, on 18 July 2017 - 04:23 PM, said:
Trolling a dedicated whale with a Mad Cat fetish...I wouldn't put it past PGI. I think this is the best and most likely explanation.
I mean I just can't think of how they could have made this iconic mech look LESS bada$$. A pink nose and fluffy tail would not lookout of place on this thing.
#13
Posted 18 July 2017 - 04:28 PM
This could be PGI's way of saying "Be careful what you ask for..."
Edited by FupDup, 18 July 2017 - 04:30 PM.
#14
Posted 18 July 2017 - 04:30 PM
#15
Posted 18 July 2017 - 04:31 PM
#16
Posted 18 July 2017 - 04:32 PM
FupDup, on 18 July 2017 - 04:28 PM, said:
God lord...
If this is true...
That would explain the state of CW, balance and well,everything!
For the love of mechageezus, STOP asking for game improvements!!!!
BEHOLD THE OP! THAT is what you get when PGI grants requests!
The horror, the horror.
#17
Posted 18 July 2017 - 04:34 PM
Deathlike, on 18 July 2017 - 04:30 PM, said:
that poor mech. More shocking is the number of people who actually think that not only does it look good... but is an improvement over the MW4 one!
Further proof that too much computer porn will make people go blind I guess.....
Bud Crue, on 18 July 2017 - 04:32 PM, said:
God lord...
If this is true...
That would explain the state of CW, balance and well,everything!
For the love of mechageezus, STOP asking for game improvements!!!!
BEHOLD THE OP! THAT is what you get when PGI grants requests!
The horror, the horror.
Well..... I think it's all in HOW ya ask... I got a fixed Warhammer model, a fixed K2 and a Police Car Urbie...... though I never actually asked for the last one because I didn't want to come across too self serving.... (I just didn't discourage others from asking.....)
#18
Posted 18 July 2017 - 05:05 PM
Bishop Steiner, on 18 July 2017 - 04:34 PM, said:
Further proof that too much computer porn will make people go blind I guess.....
Well, technically
So, I'm sure we'll get over such a wonderful addition/patch.
#19
Posted 18 July 2017 - 05:12 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users