Jump to content

Rac Spin-Up Tweak


9 replies to this topic

Poll: RAC Speed-Up (14 member(s) have cast votes)

RAC shoots while spin-up

  1. Yes (9 votes [64.29%])

    Percentage of vote: 64.29%

  2. No (5 votes [35.71%])

    Percentage of vote: 35.71%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 The6thMessenger

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Nova Captain
  • Nova Captain
  • 8,104 posts
  • LocationFrom a distance in an Urbie with a HAG, delivering righteous fury to heretics.

Posted 19 July 2017 - 02:21 PM

View PostThe6thMessenger, on 19 July 2017 - 02:20 PM, said:



Currently, I found that the RAC spin-up is outright problematic, especially in our peekaboo meta. What if we could shoot the RAC immediately, but at a slower rate of fire but then speeds up. This way it could even keep a high amount of spin-up duration, but at the same time solves the peekaboo for RAC users.


#2 Bishop Steiner

    ForumWarrior

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Hammer
  • The Hammer
  • 47,187 posts
  • Locationclimbing Mt Tryhard, one smoldering Meta-Mech corpse at a time

Posted 19 July 2017 - 02:23 PM

Posted Image

#3 HammerMaster

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Benefactor
  • The Benefactor
  • 2,516 posts
  • LocationNew Hampshire, USA

Posted 19 July 2017 - 02:41 PM

Well. The answer to this is: Maybe. IT all depends on what "powers" the rotation of the barrels. Eg. US made Gatling that are electric have to wait for spin time to start fire. The Russian gas type fire to make power from the gas.
http://modernfirearm...nd-other-e.html

Remember those "named" weapons that us Lore Nerds were clamoring for FOR YEARS NOW!?

Edited by HammerMaster, 19 July 2017 - 02:46 PM.


#4 The6thMessenger

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Nova Captain
  • Nova Captain
  • 8,104 posts
  • LocationFrom a distance in an Urbie with a HAG, delivering righteous fury to heretics.

Posted 19 July 2017 - 03:03 PM

View PostHammerMaster, on 19 July 2017 - 02:41 PM, said:

Well. The answer to this is: Maybe. IT all depends on what "powers" the rotation of the barrels. Eg. US made Gatling that are electric have to wait for spin time to start fire. The Russian gas type fire to make power from the gas.
http://modernfirearm...nd-other-e.html

Remember those "named" weapons that us Lore Nerds were clamoring for FOR YEARS NOW!?


This is not real life, this is a game. Stop over thinking it.

#5 HammerMaster

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Benefactor
  • The Benefactor
  • 2,516 posts
  • LocationNew Hampshire, USA

Posted 19 July 2017 - 03:50 PM

View PostThe6thMessenger, on 19 July 2017 - 03:03 PM, said:


This is not real life, this is a game. Stop over thinking it.

View PostThe6thMessenger, on 19 July 2017 - 03:03 PM, said:


This is not real life, this is a game. Stop over thinking it.


Sir. This "game" draws from real life AND Science Fiction. Multibarrel guns exist now and are powered 1 of many ways. If you read my LAST Sentence. You will see that you can take this and ADD it to the list of Signature Items that we COULD have had in this "game". EG. Hellstar PPC , Poland Gauss Rifle Ad Nauseum, that could have added to the uniqueness.

Edited by HammerMaster, 19 July 2017 - 03:53 PM.


#6 HammerMaster

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Benefactor
  • The Benefactor
  • 2,516 posts
  • LocationNew Hampshire, USA

Posted 19 July 2017 - 03:54 PM

Wait. Are you not the OP? Why would you nay-say when I am giving you reasons how what you want works!?

#7 HammerMaster

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Benefactor
  • The Benefactor
  • 2,516 posts
  • LocationNew Hampshire, USA

Posted 19 July 2017 - 04:06 PM

model Country caliber number of barrels Rate of fire, rounds per minute weight, the gun itself power source length peak recoil force (estimated) XM214 Microgun USA 5.56 mm NATO 6 up to 10 000 15 kg electrical 0.69 m 110 kg (240 lbs) M134 Minigun USA 7.62 mm NATO 6 4 000 - 6 000 18.8 kg electrical 0.8 m 120 kg (270 lbs) GShG-7.62 Russia 7.62x54 mm R 4 6 000 19 kg gas operated ?? 120 kg (270 lbs) YakB-12.7 Russia 12.7x108 mm 4 4 000 - 5 000 45 kg gas operated ?? 520 kg (1140 lbs) GAU-19/A USA 12.7x99mm 3 1 300 64 kg electrical 1.37 m 120 kg (270 lbs) M61 Vulcan USA 20 mm 6 up to 6 000 114 kg electrical or hydraulics 1.83 m ??? GSh-6-23M Russia 23 mm 6 10 000 73 kg gas operated ?? ??? GAU-12/U USA 25 mm 5 4 200 120 kg pneumatics ?? ??? GSh-6-30 Russia 30 mm 6 6 000 149 kg gas operated ?? ??? GAU-8/A USA 30 mm 7 1 800 or 4 200 281 kg hydraulics 2.9 m > 4 ton [color=#000000][/color][/center]

#8 The6thMessenger

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Nova Captain
  • Nova Captain
  • 8,104 posts
  • LocationFrom a distance in an Urbie with a HAG, delivering righteous fury to heretics.

Posted 19 July 2017 - 04:39 PM

View PostHammerMaster, on 19 July 2017 - 03:50 PM, said:


Sir. This "game" draws from real life AND Science Fiction. Multibarrel guns exist now and are powered 1 of many ways. If you read my LAST Sentence. You will see that you can take this and ADD it to the list of Signature Items that we COULD have had in this "game". EG. Hellstar PPC , Poland Gauss Rifle Ad Nauseum, that could have added to the uniqueness.


Pal, again stop thinking too hard about it.

You think actual legged mechs are even feasible?

View PostHammerMaster, on 19 July 2017 - 03:54 PM, said:

Wait. Are you not the OP? Why would you nay-say when I am giving you reasons how what you want works!?


Because i don't care much about the lore, rather i want a functioning game. Sure gas-operated gatling guns exist, no doubt about that. I'm a Gatling Gun aficionado, i know my stuff. But there's a place to everything, right now specifying how it works is moot for we can just simply impose what we think how it works by filling in the gaps of knowledge.

Just calm down, it's just a game.

Edited by The6thMessenger, 19 July 2017 - 05:10 PM.


#9 Tarogato

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Civil Servant
  • Civil Servant
  • 6,558 posts
  • LocationUSA

Posted 19 July 2017 - 05:29 PM

I vote no. It doesn't help gameplay. Each shell only deals 0.8 or 1.5 damage, you can't deal "peakaboo" damage with that. And I don't like the effect aesthetically, I prefer the wind up until it begins firing.

#10 SPNKRGrenth

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 184 posts

Posted 20 July 2017 - 12:06 AM

I voted yes, because then part of my jam bar isn't getting wasted by not firing at all even though it's filling from the spin up. Though I feel effectively the same thing could be done by just giving the jam bars an extra half second of firing time to do a similar thing.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users