Hg Vs. Pgi Legal Fund Cockpit Items Now
#21
Posted 24 July 2017 - 10:46 AM
#22
Posted 24 July 2017 - 11:11 AM
Arnold The Governator, on 24 July 2017 - 10:46 AM, said:
And Microsoft will pat them on the head and send them to bed with a glass of milk. It's not Microsoft's battle if they have no stake in the process.
I just found it amusing that Microsoft was the only IP owner that Harmony Gold was unwilling to sue. They scuttled back under their rock until it was safe to come out again.
#24
Posted 24 July 2017 - 11:50 AM
Sjorpha, on 24 July 2017 - 10:38 AM, said:
That is not how copyright law works in either US nor Sweden. For it to be a copyright law case so must it be a copy, not something that looks remotely similar. The law that is more fuzzy is the Trademark law and this is the one companies mostly use in these kind of cases. But this case is based on copyright law and the use of those specific images. Quite frankly, HG should lose this case. The only problem for PGI is the costs involved in defending themselves.
#25
Posted 24 July 2017 - 12:49 PM
#26
Posted 24 July 2017 - 12:59 PM
I'm no artist but I can obviously see the differences between ALL of the contested designs and I believe it comes down to the overall % of change between the "original" and the "infringing" designs.
#27
Posted 24 July 2017 - 03:28 PM
#28
Posted 24 July 2017 - 04:01 PM
Know why USA hasnt seen any new Macross ect for 20 years, cause noone in Japan wants to deal with HG.
#29
Posted 24 July 2017 - 04:18 PM
#30
Posted 24 July 2017 - 04:35 PM
Formosa The God, on 24 July 2017 - 10:29 AM, said:
Via the precedent set in the Playmates v FASA case, as long as there exists more than a 15% difference, it's kosher. It would tickle me pink to see our TPTB use a ruling against them in a previous case to nail these repugnant, vacuous, soul sucking, oxygen pirates to the legal wall.
#31
Posted 24 July 2017 - 04:52 PM
#32
Posted 24 July 2017 - 05:02 PM
The gavel (animation bangs down on a kill)
And or as a warhorn that sounds like a gavel banging down and says "motion denied!" Or some such.
The wig (hanging item)
#35
Posted 24 July 2017 - 07:15 PM
So for the love of BT I guess supporting PGI is in my best interest.
Supposed this case cannot be won legally, how about a player petition?
I wouldn't have heard of Harmony Gold or Macross if it wasn't for Battletech. Irrc in my youth I saw the Robotech movie on the
shelf at the video rental. But back then it looked so outdated that I never picked it up.
I mean if Harmony Gold would finally make the new RoboTech movie that supposedly has a director now, I would watch it or play a Robotech game if it was good. So basically they would get derivative revenue from me because of BattleTech. Thus they do not suffer any damages from BattleTechs copyright infringement.
I mean I can love BattleTech and Transformers, or Ghost in the Shell and Appleseed. Or EDM and metal. See where I am going with this?
#37
Posted 24 July 2017 - 09:09 PM
and Gold mechs.
Harmony Gold mechs.
Gold PHX special edition mech?
#38
Posted 24 July 2017 - 09:11 PM
#39
Posted 24 July 2017 - 09:42 PM
FYI, Battletech is owned by TOPPS....so...why aren't they going after them? PGI could LITTERALLY use that to win the case, as well as the fact of RELEVENCY!
#40
Posted 24 July 2017 - 09:54 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users