Jump to content

Mw5 Founders Package?


93 replies to this topic

#81 King Kahuna

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Survivor
  • Survivor
  • 114 posts

Posted 28 August 2017 - 03:37 PM

View PostSpheroid, on 27 August 2017 - 12:16 PM, said:

Please don't reward bad behavior. MWO is no longer the sole Battletech product. Give instead to turned based game by Harebrained.


I cant :(. I detest turn based games.

#82 Naglinator

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Mercenary
  • Mercenary
  • 975 posts
  • LocationStrana Mechty

Posted 28 August 2017 - 03:46 PM

View PostJackofallpots, on 28 August 2017 - 03:26 PM, said:

I wouldnt mind a game that only takes 14 hours to complete as long as there is plenty of replayability

Thats something a lot of games lack though nowadays


Same people who make the VIP AI will be making the MW5 AI... yeah I'm sure their will be tonnes of replayability...

#83 JediPanther

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 4,087 posts
  • LocationLost in my C1

Posted 28 August 2017 - 03:52 PM

I want only one thing from mw5. Steam workshop support. PGi can make mw5 as crapy as they can. Modders can make it worth playing and fun and hopefully last years like skyrim and fallout. They do that and I might buy one of the ultimate collector mwo packs.

#84 Smites

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 194 posts

Posted 28 August 2017 - 05:27 PM

Lets try to change this into something more constructive. How many shiny things would PGI need to put into MW:V preorder to get you to buy it early? To say nothing of the quality (or lack thereof) of the finish product. Remember. It may be good.

#85 Jackofallpots

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Knight Errant
  • Knight Errant
  • 219 posts

Posted 29 August 2017 - 07:25 AM

Cockpit items, paintjobs and decals arent enough to pique my interest

The thing that would completely turn me off from the game though is if you had to buy the mechs through DLC to use them in a singleplayer game, like I've seen done with some racing games.

#86 Karl Streiger

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Wrath
  • Wrath
  • 20,369 posts
  • LocationBlack Dot in a Sea of Blue

Posted 29 August 2017 - 07:27 AM

preorder bonus goal? open for mods

#87 Jay Leon Hart

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Spear
  • The Spear
  • 4,669 posts

Posted 29 August 2017 - 07:45 AM

View PostKarl Streiger, on 29 August 2017 - 07:27 AM, said:

preorder bonus goal? open for mods

If you mean the same pre-order milestone incentives they tried to pull with Deus Ex Mankind Divided, hell to the no.

#88 Nemesis Duck

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 394 posts

Posted 29 August 2017 - 09:03 AM

View PostCMDR Sunset Shimmer, on 27 August 2017 - 03:15 PM, said:

What did Bethesdia and Obsidian do?


Skyrim Super Awesome OMG Edition - Jan 2018 (Where's Black Marsh!)

View PostJuodas Varnas, on 28 August 2017 - 07:45 AM, said:

I'm not gonna lie, i'd pay more than 60 bucks if it had Quads in it.


I heard there's tri-walkers but no quads.

View PostAppogee, on 27 August 2017 - 04:23 PM, said:

My low expectations for MW5 are entirely based on my 5 years of experience of being a PGI customer at a quite high level of expenditure.

What have I actually observed during those 5 years of MWO development...?
  • Pervasive 'mimimal viable product' mentality and lack of concern for quality control.
  • Consistent over-commitment and under-delivery of key development features (in the case of CW, actual deliberate deception about development progress and intent).
  • Little leverage of BT lore that could have made the game much deeper.
  • Complicated/unintuitive new balancing mechanics (eg ghost heat) instead of simpler solutions.
  • Copy/pasting cliched game ideas (eg. loot crate/roulette wheel/keys), without even the minimal modification (eg. battle salvage/technicians) that would make them appropriate to the game.
  • Long periods of imbalance/issues followed by wild balancing over-corrections.
  • Ignoring and then isolating themselves from customer feedback, other than a small echo chamber of paid cheerleaders.
  • Significant map and mode design issues that have never been addressed (eg. Escort AI, FP maps).
  • Ignoring significant underlying quality of life features requested by customers (eg. skill tree saving, loadout saving) in favour of trivial things that can be sold (eg bolt-ons).
  • Ongoing efforts to increase grind and reduce the value provided to customers in virtual currency, early adopter packs, leaderboard comps.
I desperately want MWO - and MW5 - to be all that they can be. For PGI to be a wildly successful game developer. For all of us to be happy, high-spending customers... introducing new generations of players to the franchise we love.

For that to happen, PGI would need to rethink it's approach to game development.


I love you, man.

Edited by Nemesis Duck, 29 August 2017 - 09:21 AM.


#89 AncientRaig

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Guardian
  • Guardian
  • 584 posts

Posted 29 August 2017 - 12:03 PM

View PostTLBFestus, on 28 August 2017 - 02:28 PM, said:


Can I get some of what your smoking? Check out HBS track record before you paint PGI as the messiah.

I'm not painting PGI as the messiah. All I'm saying is that HBS has only made turn-based tactical RPGs and one third person Rougelike. They do good work, but they've never attempted something like an MW5. And if you're referring to me saying that HBS wouldn't have been able to make BATTLETECH without the success of MWO, that's not my words. That's straight from HBS themselves.

#90 Metus regem

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Sureshot
  • The Sureshot
  • 10,282 posts
  • LocationNAIS College of Military Science OCS courses

Posted 29 August 2017 - 12:20 PM

View PostImperius, on 27 August 2017 - 12:09 PM, said:

Already asked Russ to make it happen on twitter



I'll ask him at MechCon, when he can't pretend to miss the question.

#91 Smites

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 194 posts

Posted 29 August 2017 - 02:46 PM

View PostMetus regem, on 29 August 2017 - 12:20 PM, said:



I'll ask him at MechCon, when he can't pretend to miss the question.


He can't pretend to miss the question, but he can pretend he gave you a real answer.

Just like you can ask your local government officials questions at a town hall. They will answer, but it either won't mean anything, won't make sense, or you'll still be ignored as they move onto somebody elses question.

#92 MW Waldorf Statler

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 9,459 posts
  • LocationGermany/Berlin

Posted 29 August 2017 - 07:58 PM

View PostNaglinator, on 28 August 2017 - 03:46 PM, said:

Same people who make the VIP AI will be making the MW5 AI... yeah I'm sure their will be tonnes of replayability...

The VIP has nothing AI , its only a dice Roll mechanic for the Route ...
lets seeing the Company Game History ...great Experience for a MW5 Posted Image (and Die Hard:Nakotami Place and Transformers big Fails and Flops (wikipedia)

Games developed PGI is like other Companys...great Words ,and minimal products

Edited by Old MW4 Ranger, 29 August 2017 - 08:03 PM.


#93 Cptn Goodvibes Pig of Steel

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Shredder
  • Shredder
  • 125 posts
  • LocationBrisbane, Australia

Posted 29 August 2017 - 08:15 PM

Oh great! Get first in line for a sh#t sandwich. I'll give it a miss. Thanks, but no thanks.





3 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users