15 replies to this topic

[Angel of Annihilation]

Ok I started off complaining but now I have to actually give props where props are due.

Thank you PGI, I personally really appreciate that you have listened to our feedback on the Rewards Package and have revised it to be more fair to everyone involved.

I will be honest and say I am not sure it is 100% where it needs to be for everyone concerned and I will also be honest and say I will still have to pony up additional $$$ if I want to qualify for the Top Tier which is still a bit irksome, but the fact that you actually looked at the rewards program, evaluated it based on our feedback and improved it to be much more fair goes a long way with me.
For that I will give you my thanks.

[Angel of Annihilation]

Now I understand why PGI doesn't listen to us all that much. Complain about PGI and your thread will have 100 pages of replies. Thank them and it is a ghost town.

[TheFallOfTheReaper]

Lol because they would then have to take their ****** posts back, but bravo, ty pgi, now the other half my unit is garunteed free jumper linebackers, thanks again for a freebie gate hopper :3

[Bombast]

Viktor Drake, on 15 September 2017 - 04:04 PM, said:

Now I understand why PGI doesn't listen to us all that much. Complain about PGI and your thread will have 100 pages of replies. Thank them and it is a ghost town.

All the people who complained about it are probably too busy trying to cancel the orders they put in yesterday after 'closing their wallets' on the forum.

I'll give it to PGI - It's a good change. But my 'complaints' (More like explanations, as it's not something that particularly bothers me) still stand. Happy for the people who are getting more loot, though. Enjoy!

[TheFallOfTheReaper]

Yeah but here's the epic catch, will they refund injections that happened today? Or will that force a rollback for each account with a refund?

[Trenchbird]

What's funny to me is, with the altered requirements, I actually got the two rewards I was missing (The IS Top Tier and Ultimate.)

[kuma8877]

I just sent Russ a tweet thanking him for the change. I was well qualified after the change for both top tier awards.

Thanks Viktor, for speaking up.

[GoatHILL]

Good on them.

[kf envy]

Viktor Drake, on 15 September 2017 - 04:04 PM, said:

Now I understand why PGI doesn't listen to us all that much. Complain about PGI and your thread will have 100 pages of replies. Thank them and it is a ghost town.

ya just like colorblind support we been asking for back in beta.

[Davegt27]

very cool it is working out for you guys

where did they post the info?

[kuma8877]

Davegt27, on 15 September 2017 - 04:29 PM, said:

very cool it is working out for you guys

where did they post the info?

It's changed on the front page, as well as the announcement page now.

[Angel of Annihilation]

ShadowHimself, on 15 September 2017 - 04:07 PM, said:

Lol because they would then have to take their ****** posts back, but bravo, ty pgi, now the other half my unit is garunteed free jumper linebackers, thanks again for a freebie gate hopper :3

I still think all you guys commenting about the upcoming OP Linebacker are going to be in for a shock when you actually build out your Jumping LBs and realize that just what losing about half your firepower and cooling capability to mount JJs really means. 10.5 tons is all you get to work with after you mount those 6 JJs that you will need to hop those gates. 3 JJ isn't going to do it on a 65 tonner so you will need all 6 too, no skimping.

[Joshua Obrien]

I give PGI alot of **** but I gotta give them props when they deserve it.

Edited by Joshua Obrien, 15 September 2017 - 09:28 PM.

[Mendicant Bias]

Imagine dropping $160 for very attractive ultimate rewards. lol

[Paigan]

Viktor Drake, on 15 September 2017 - 03:21 PM, said:

Ok I started off complaining but now I have to actually give props where props are due.

Thank you PGI, I personally really appreciate that you have listened to our feedback on the Rewards Package and have revised it to be more fair to everyone involved.

[...]

Hehe. When I read the update, I spontaneously thought of you and thought "Ah, he did it."
I found the talk of "being penalized" to be a bit exaggerated, but "improperly rewarded" was indeed appropriate, IMHO.

So, gratz.

[oldradagast]

Agreed.

This is nice step in the right direction to reward people who spend a lot of money in this game while worrying a lot less about which exact products in which combination they bought when to get their rewards.

Edited by oldradagast, 16 September 2017 - 05:30 AM.