Roadbuster, on 23 September 2017 - 01:59 AM, said:
The funny thing is that you get blinded even if someone is shooting your leg.
I am not sure it is THAT bad, but that's half my point of the discussion is asking how impactful others have found it to be, I myself noticed it when twist tanking in fights with RACs, no matter where they seemed to hit me, as long as they hit, there would be a momentary blinding effect, which is why I even brought it up.
There is a difference between an intended effect of a weapon and an unintended one, and we don't really know if this is or isn't one, it is just currently the case. Is it too much or is it perfect? Is a blinding effect a good design choice in general, and good for this gun specifically? Etc, etc. I don't want to polarise the binary positions of yay or nay here, it is a discussion.
nehebkau, on 22 September 2017 - 05:46 AM, said:
The ONLY thing that makes the weapon even marginally usable is the blinding effect. Do you understand the concept that prolonged face-time is a bad thing? The RACs are all face-time and without the blinding effect they are a big "SHOOT ME IN THE CT PLEASE!" weapon. If you remove the blinding effect, these weapons are entirely useless. And only marginal because most non underhive players can simply shoot through the flashes...
So yes, removing the blinding effect from a weapon, where aiming to hit near the cockpit with them to cause the blinding effect actually takes a lot of skill, will render the weapon useless and is, BY ITS VERY ESSENCE, a nerf.
To the idea that the gun should blind due to its facetime, that is fair enough, but why doesn't it also apply to AC2s, MGs, LRM streams etc? These weapons actually do have to hit near the cockpit to cause any kind of similar blinding effect and are also similar to the facetime nature of RACs, even short and heavy streams like the UAC20 double tap burst doesn't seem cause an anywhere near similar effect, but maybe that is just an optical illusion in how the guns fire slightly differently.
And with that argument in mind, do you feel it still applies when people are saying it can be ignored/fired through?