Johnny Z, on 26 September 2017 - 09:46 PM, said:
Bound to be "incidents" and trolling. But sometimes its best to let the players work it out themselves. Its a balance thing I guess.
Sure but if it still counts as team damage, then what is the bigger threat, being rammed by a teammate or just being outright shot by a teammate?
terrycloth, on 26 September 2017 - 02:36 PM, said:
Making ramming useful is not going to stop people from ramming. You'll just end up making people pissy at teammates who walked into them while zoomed in.
You still get that now in various ways, people stuck in behind you blocking movement are pretty likely to get you killed or highly damaged, people walking in front of fields of fire risk being hit etc etc.
And again the idea isn't to make it useful, it is to make it appropriately damaging to both parties, in particular the "offender" which can be identified in many cases by simply noting who was moving and who wasn't etc. So the result is that no one wants to ram eachother at all unless in some dire desperate situation.
In the extreme sense of it picture a head on collision between a light doing 165kph and a Kodiaks leg doing 65kph, if the result was such extreme damage to the light that it killed him, the Kodiaks leg would likely be destroyed as well. I am not saying put the damage up to such extreme levels, but nobody would desire that result, and even a Kodiak desperately trying to do it as he is slightly favoured in the scenario has to make a head on collision with a light happen, which would be almost purely luck base with that speed difference.