D3 may still win just because its name, its ratings and the amount it sold. I agree that it had issues in the long run of the game, for me the economy sucked (especially after the gold dupe bug when they launched the USD auction house). Inferno was just a mistake in my eyes, and they promptly nerfed peoples ways of getting through inferno. Ratings were based on early play and not complete play through (I feel), which is what prompted the high numbers. Still that may actually be enough for them. I also was looking for more D2 from D3, but they wanted something more streamlined and probably hit a broader audience. I knew it would not live up to the hype there was simply no way it could.
I didn't have an issue with the online only (I understood why they did it), but that doesn't make it right.
There are many many games. Don't forget Transformers Fall of cybertron also is coming out, along with many other games that people are looking forward too. (Most of which have a 2 after the name). I am looking forward to just about all of them. I actually randomed to this site because my brother found the joystick. Needless to say, I love mech games and looking forward to this game now too. There hopefully will be a good fight for game of the year, and I hope the game that wins doesn't do so just on hype/ initial sells.
One note though, Diablo overall was a good game. If it had any other name, it would have been considered much better, but the expectations were extremely high for a 12 year wait, and from Blizzard who constantly delayed it because it wasn't ready (my opinion is that it was ready to cannibalize WoW, so they wanted to wait). I still played it a ton, still enjoyed most of it. But it definitely had glaring faults, which could simply not be overlooked for the name Diablo and Blizzard.
Edited by Flamekin, 24 July 2012 - 10:05 AM.