Jump to content

A Fafnir Ct Fix Existed Before The 'mech Was Designed For Mwo


4 replies to this topic

#1 TELEFORCE

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Ardent
  • The Ardent
  • 1,587 posts

Posted 21 April 2018 - 07:08 PM

Posted Image

Posted Image
Posted Image

In none of the original source material does the CT of the Fafnir stick out as far as the MW4 rendition the MWO version is based on. I get MW4 nostalgia, but I think it went too far this time. It's not like the 'mech was designed intentionally for MW4: Mercenaries; it appeared in Field Manual: Lyran Alliance in 2000, two years before MW4: Mercenaries. I wouldn't mind seeing the 'mech remodeled as it looks in IWM miniature form, or the TRO/FMLA.

#2 Nightbird

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The God of Death
  • The God of Death
  • 7,518 posts

Posted 21 April 2018 - 07:23 PM

This is only the 7th thread to bring this up... In the original art, the width of the ST is 1/3 the length of the side torso if not 1/4.

#3 El Bandito

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Big Daddy
  • Big Daddy
  • 26,736 posts
  • LocationStill doing ungodly amount of damage, but with more accuracy.

Posted 21 April 2018 - 11:05 PM

So you wish to increase Fatnir's hitboxes? Instead of a simple solution such as more armor quirks? Dunno if Fatnir needs help, I don't have one yet.

Edited by El Bandito, 21 April 2018 - 11:06 PM.


#4 Battlemaster56

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Pack Leader
  • Pack Leader
  • 2,894 posts
  • LocationOn the not so distant moon on Endor

Posted 22 April 2018 - 05:47 AM

Wondering when was the MW4 Merc art for the Fapnir came out before the Official manuel showing it art.

#5 PocketYoda

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Shredder
  • Shredder
  • 4,147 posts
  • LocationAustralia

Posted 22 April 2018 - 05:55 AM

If they copied those miniatures it would be exactly like the sunspider which you may remember was also considered a failure..





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users