Jump to content

[Oversight?] Possible Number Error In The New Ammo Counts

News Balance

2 replies to this topic

#1 FunkyT

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • The Boombox
  • The Boombox
  • 139 posts
  • LocationAt the Front, overextending, with no support

Posted 14 June 2018 - 01:54 PM

So after having a look at the patch notes and the redistribution of ammo values per ton, a potential issue has come up:

Quote

C-AC 20 / C-UAC 20:
1 ton: Old 28 / New 32 / Change +4
0.5 ton: Old 14 / New 18 / Change +4


When looking at the ammo values for C-AC 20 and C-UAC 20, the full- and half-tons get the same ammo bonus, bringing the full-ton up to 32 and half-ton to 18 respectively.
And there's the issue.

1 ton = 32 shots
2x 0.5 tons = 36 shots

This can't be right, can it?
Is there an actual reason to make it so that half tons yield more ammo than full tons? Am I not seeing something?
Or is this an oversight?



Edit:
I can't figure out for the life of me how to properly import the relevant excerpts from the table in the patch notes. My apologies.

Edited by FunkyT, 14 June 2018 - 02:18 PM.


#2 Revis Volek

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The 1 Percent
  • The 1 Percent
  • 7,247 posts
  • Google+: Link
  • Facebook: Link
  • LocationBack in the Pilots chair

Posted 14 June 2018 - 04:32 PM

So PGI doesnt know how to math?



Imagine that, Someone thought that adding the same amount of shells to half the tonnage wasnt gonna be an issue.


Should be 2 on a .5 ton PGI, tsk tsk.

Edited by Revis Volek, 14 June 2018 - 04:34 PM.


#3 Tina Benoit

    Community Manager

  • Developer
  • Developer
  • 817 posts

Posted 14 June 2018 - 05:17 PM

Apologies, we just edited the patch notes to the following:
C-AC 20 New for 0.5 Ton = 16 (instead of 18)
C-Ultra AC 20 New for 0.5 Ton = 16 (instead of 18)





2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users