Jump to content

The Longbow. Same Old Assault Lrm Mech Or Different?


44 replies to this topic

#21 C H E E K I E Z

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Rage
  • Rage
  • 540 posts

Posted 17 August 2018 - 09:32 PM

View PostEl Bandito, on 17 August 2018 - 11:33 AM, said:


Not to mention the chance of some decent missile quirks, which most Stalkers and Cyclopses lack.


HOW TF DOES NO ONE THINK TO USE THE AWESOMES, THEY ARE BUILT FOR LRMS

#22 DrxAbstract

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Butcher
  • The Butcher
  • 1,672 posts
  • LocationOutreach

Posted 17 August 2018 - 09:49 PM

View PostC H E E K I E Z, on 17 August 2018 - 09:32 PM, said:


HOW TF DOES NO ONE THINK TO USE THE AWESOMES, THEY ARE BUILT FOR LRMS


Only 80 tons.

Most/all hard points in torso, limiting extensive missile builds to LFE engines, if not STD engines or vice versa; smaller launchers to make everything fit.

Low engine cap.

The awesome isn't a terrible missile platform, but the Longbow is better suited for it.

Edited by DrxAbstract, 17 August 2018 - 09:50 PM.


#23 El Bandito

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Big Daddy
  • Big Daddy
  • 26,736 posts
  • LocationStill doing ungodly amount of damage, but with more accuracy.

Posted 17 August 2018 - 11:07 PM

View PostC H E E K I E Z, on 17 August 2018 - 09:32 PM, said:

HOW TF DOES NO ONE THINK TO USE THE AWESOMES, THEY ARE BUILT FOR LRMS


I like the Longbow, since MW4.

#24 Jackal Noble

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,863 posts
  • LocationTerra

Posted 17 August 2018 - 11:07 PM

Gonna say big pass and honestly not sure how this thread is alive. Bane would make a great missile boat as well, but nooooOOO.

Edited by Jackal Noble, 17 August 2018 - 11:07 PM.


#25 El Bandito

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Big Daddy
  • Big Daddy
  • 26,736 posts
  • LocationStill doing ungodly amount of damage, but with more accuracy.

Posted 17 August 2018 - 11:28 PM

View PostJackal Noble, on 17 August 2018 - 11:07 PM, said:

Gonna say big pass and honestly not sure how this thread is alive. Bane would make a great missile boat as well, but nooooOOO.


Cause there are plenty of people like the Longbow. ;)

Bane is whole another level of powercreep that we do not need right now.

#26 Khobai

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • Elite Founder
  • 23,969 posts

Posted 18 August 2018 - 12:13 AM

Bane would be fine. It cant carry enough ammo to use more than x8 UAC2s.

At best it would be a slightly better Ultraviolet. Which still isnt good.

Edited by Khobai, 18 August 2018 - 12:14 AM.


#27 El Bandito

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Big Daddy
  • Big Daddy
  • 26,736 posts
  • LocationStill doing ungodly amount of damage, but with more accuracy.

Posted 18 August 2018 - 12:24 AM

View PostKhobai, on 18 August 2018 - 12:13 AM, said:

Bane would be fine. It cant carry enough ammo to use more than x8 UAC2s.

At best it would be a slightly better Ultraviolet. Which still isnt good.


It can run 9 with enough ammo, all high mounted. It will be a much better UV, not slightly better, since UV has a hard time clearing the ridge top. UAC2s are too hot and not worth the jam, so CAC2s are better.

Edited by El Bandito, 18 August 2018 - 12:27 AM.


#28 Battlemaster56

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Pack Leader
  • Pack Leader
  • 2,930 posts
  • LocationOn the not so distant moon on Endor

Posted 18 August 2018 - 02:05 AM

10 lbx2 or bust

#29 Khobai

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • Elite Founder
  • 23,969 posts

Posted 18 August 2018 - 02:18 AM

View PostEl Bandito, on 18 August 2018 - 12:24 AM, said:

It can run 9 with enough ammo, all high mounted. It will be a much better UV, not slightly better, since UV has a hard time clearing the ridge top. UAC2s are too hot and not worth the jam, so CAC2s are better.


ok but thats still not good lol

i dunno why you think thats a good build. ultraviolet isnt good. why would the bane be good even with one more AC2?

if they buffed CUAC2/CAC2/LBX2 maybe it would be good. But those weapons are jank.

not to mention the bane would probably have the worse agility than the kodiak-3.

Edited by Khobai, 18 August 2018 - 02:20 AM.


#30 El Bandito

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Big Daddy
  • Big Daddy
  • 26,736 posts
  • LocationStill doing ungodly amount of damage, but with more accuracy.

Posted 18 August 2018 - 02:19 AM

View PostBattlemaster56, on 18 August 2018 - 02:05 AM, said:

10 lbx2 or bust


Yep Bane can mount such config with enough ammo to guarantee #1 spot in Solaris Div.


View PostKhobai, on 18 August 2018 - 02:18 AM, said:

ok but thats still not good lol

i dunno why you think thats a good build. ultraviolet isnt good. why would the bane be good even with one more AC2?

if they buffed CUAC2/CAC2/LBX2 maybe it would be good. But those weapons are jank.


Not in competitive, but in FP and QP, such builds will wreck the opposition. Not to mention in Solaris, as I mentioned above. UV suffers from low mounts. If it's mounts were are cockpit level, like that of Bane, then it woulda been a different story. Just like the difference between pre-hardpoint location nerf BNC-3M, and post nerf one.

Edited by El Bandito, 18 August 2018 - 02:22 AM.


#31 JediPanther

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 4,087 posts
  • LocationLost in my C1

Posted 18 August 2018 - 08:11 AM

i'll stick with the catapults and vanguard for my lrm-ing.

#32 LT. HARDCASE

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Spear
  • The Spear
  • 2,706 posts
  • LocationDark Space

Posted 18 August 2018 - 08:23 AM

The LGB-13NAIS with its 6 Light Autocannon 5s would be interesting.

It's passed the time for PGI to add those to the game.

#33 MW Waldorf Statler

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 9,459 posts
  • LocationGermany/Berlin

Posted 19 August 2018 - 12:26 AM

and with all this Guns ,enormous Ghostheat thats not can use more as 3 same Time...love my old AC5 Builds with 3 or 4 AC5 ...once the high Weight for the Systems ,the Danger of Ammoexplosion and big Place was the Price against the lasers for a cool running weaponssystem ..now we have Ghostheat for it thats make it more bad against the Lasers...
Please PGI play ypu own Game!

#34 The Basilisk

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Mercenary
  • The Mercenary
  • 3,270 posts
  • LocationFrankfurt a.M.

Posted 19 August 2018 - 01:32 AM

Only LRMish mech that would me get playing and paying again would be the Crusader atm...beside that...well there is still no game that I could play besides all the still prove of concept quality maps and modes we got since forever.

#35 jss78

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Philanthropist
  • Philanthropist
  • 2,575 posts
  • LocationHelsinki

Posted 19 August 2018 - 04:23 AM

I'd love the Longbow, though with the current LRM 'mechanics I'd just run MRM's in it.

I love my 2xMRM40 Archer, and I'd run some beefier variation of that.

I think there's a place for 'mechs that are included just because they're cool, and Longbow is one of these. No 'mech screams "Eat missiles!" like the Longbow.

#36 C H E E K I E Z

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Rage
  • Rage
  • 540 posts

Posted 19 August 2018 - 07:20 AM

View PostDrxAbstract, on 17 August 2018 - 09:49 PM, said:

Only 80 tons.

Most/all hard points in torso, limiting extensive missile builds to LFE engines, if not STD engines or vice versa; smaller launchers to make everything fit.

Low engine cap.

The awesome isn't a terrible missile platform, but the Longbow is better suited for it.


is 8124 missles not enough for you?
Posted Image

Edited by C H E E K I E Z, 19 August 2018 - 07:20 AM.


#37 Ssamout

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 643 posts
  • LocationPihalla

Posted 19 August 2018 - 07:42 AM

View PostC H E E K I E Z, on 19 August 2018 - 07:20 AM, said:


is 8124 missles not enough for you?
-clip-

Thats just too meta for most.

#38 Khobai

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • Elite Founder
  • 23,969 posts

Posted 19 August 2018 - 08:54 AM

TIER5 POTATOS HATE HIM!!1

LEARN HOW TO FIRE 8000 MISSILES IN 8 MINUTES OR LESS

WELL ALSO TEACH YOU HOW TO UNBURDEN YOUR CORE BY NOT USING ARMOR

IMPROVE YOUR KDR TO 1.0 OR YOUR MONEY BACK GUARANTEED

#39 C H E E K I E Z

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Rage
  • Rage
  • 540 posts

Posted 19 August 2018 - 04:22 PM

View PostKhobai, on 19 August 2018 - 08:54 AM, said:

TIER5 POTATOS HATE HIM!!1

LEARN HOW TO FIRE 8000 MISSILES IN 8 MINUTES OR LESS

WELL ALSO TEACH YOU HOW TO UNBURDEN YOUR CORE BY NOT USING ARMOR

IMPROVE YOUR KDR TO 1.0 OR YOUR MONEY BACK GUARANTEED


If you have to ask, your not in the know. Hush now child

#40 DrxAbstract

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Butcher
  • The Butcher
  • 1,672 posts
  • LocationOutreach

Posted 19 August 2018 - 05:19 PM

View PostC H E E K I E Z, on 19 August 2018 - 07:20 AM, said:


is 8124 missles not enough for you?
Posted Image


If you dropped Beagle and an engine size you could fit 2 more tons of ammo... Amateur.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users