I had a I5-3550 (3.1 ghz), 8 GB with a TI-550. (they stopped supporting it last April) I was getting about 25-30 with dips. I got a 1060 6GB, now i get 55-60, with slight dips. It's so much better. I can push back the chip/board upgrade another year. I got a new 2TB drive myself in the mail today so i can do a fresh install.
Just wanted to give you something to compare to.
3
23 replies to this topic
#22
Posted 30 November 2018 - 05:32 PM
JediPanther, on 30 November 2018 - 04:27 PM, said:
I didn't buy the memory. Just have the 8 gig. 32gig would have been the most the board could have supported. I don't think it would have helped mwo much as a lot of other hardware threads mention it seems mwo needs all the cpu on a single thread you can shovel mwo through.
More memory will help. Copious amounts or memory will only useful for utilizing multiple tabs/programs.
The main thing to look in RAM is speed. Higher the speed the better the stable frames per second and overall frames per second, though mileage will vary. On a side note also look for ddr4 RAM cards; ddr3 is becoming extremely outdated, and will rather hinder your PCs performance overall.
JC Daxion, on 30 November 2018 - 05:19 PM, said:
I had a I5-3550 (3.1 ghz), 8 GB with a TI-550. (they stopped supporting it last April) I was getting about 25-30 with dips. I got a 1060 6GB, now i get 55-60, with slight dips. It's so much better. I can push back the chip/board upgrade another year. I got a new 2TB drive myself in the mail today so i can do a fresh install.
Just wanted to give you something to compare to.
Just wanted to give you something to compare to.
For clarification; you're running this in 1080p with medium settings I take it?
#23
-
-
- Ace Of Spades
- 17 posts
Member
Posted 30 November 2018 - 07:55 PM
JediPanther, on 30 November 2018 - 04:24 PM, said:
That's exactly the type of frame rates I had. It's not super great but good enough i could run locusts. I had all settings on low except for environment and textures which I had at medium. For skyrim and mgsv i could go medium or very high. I also turned off cockpit glass. I also tried to minimize all background proccess that I could when running mwo. At most I ran fraps,anti virus and bare minimal background processes.
I'm also running a 1080 (yes I know, bottlenecks with this cpu). So yeah, MWO just dislikes AMD sadly.
#24
-
-
- 4,864 posts
Member
- LocationTerra
Posted 30 November 2018 - 10:05 PM
Scout Derek, on 30 November 2018 - 05:32 PM, said:
More memory will help. Copious amounts or memory will only useful for utilizing multiple tabs/programs.
The main thing to look in RAM is speed. Higher the speed the better the stable frames per second and overall frames per second, though mileage will vary. On a side note also look for ddr4 RAM cards; ddr3 is becoming extremely outdated, and will rather hinder your PCs performance overall.
The main thing to look in RAM is speed. Higher the speed the better the stable frames per second and overall frames per second, though mileage will vary. On a side note also look for ddr4 RAM cards; ddr3 is becoming extremely outdated, and will rather hinder your PCs performance overall.
Not as much as you would think. but ya newer is usually better.
Edited by Jackal Noble, 30 November 2018 - 10:05 PM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
