Jump to content

Countdown To Hatamoto Chi And Charger Release


48 replies to this topic

#41 cougurt

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 428 posts

Posted 08 December 2018 - 01:20 PM

View PostFupDup, on 08 December 2018 - 12:55 PM, said:

I'm not necessarily complaining about the 1A1 and 3K having higher agility on a relative scale, just that the L7 and 1A5 have such low agility in terms of an absolute scale. They will move clunkier than several assaults of higher tonnage with bigger payloads. The least agile Chargers should still be much more agile than the real big bois.

yeah, i can agree with that. the N7 might be decent enough with its crit reduction quirk, but the 1A5 looks like it'll just be a worse victor 9S.

#42 LT. HARDCASE

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Spear
  • The Spear
  • 2,600 posts
  • LocationDark Space

Posted 08 December 2018 - 03:30 PM

View Postkapusta11, on 08 December 2018 - 03:49 AM, said:


Hatamoto-Chi is just a sad robot. No reasonable amount of quirks can fix bad hardpoints and/or low engine cap.

Nah the 27T and Shugo are going be good SRM brawlers, and boat MRMs better than anything in the 75/80/85 bracket.

Edited by LT. HARDCASE, 08 December 2018 - 03:32 PM.


#43 Will9761

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Big Brother
  • Big Brother
  • 4,165 posts

Posted 08 December 2018 - 05:07 PM

Mark Nicholson did a wonderful job modeling the Charger and Hatamoto.

#44 ScorpionNinja

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • The Spear
  • The Spear
  • 170 posts

Posted 09 December 2018 - 01:49 PM

Looking at the Charger mech, I'm pretty certain that THIS was the influence for the CHEST . . .

Posted Image

Edited by ScorpionNinja, 09 December 2018 - 02:09 PM.


#45 Zephrym

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • The Death Wish
  • The Death Wish
  • 76 posts

Posted 10 December 2018 - 02:54 PM

Just noticed on the store page for the Hatamoto-Chi, under 'mech-specs' the header says:

HATAMOTO-KU HTM-27W

Answers on a postcard for what KU might stand for!

Kill Urbies?



#46 Nightbird

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Formidable
  • The Formidable
  • 3,864 posts

Posted 10 December 2018 - 03:19 PM

View PostZephrym, on 10 December 2018 - 02:54 PM, said:

Just noticed on the store page for the Hatamoto-Chi, under 'mech-specs' the header says:

HATAMOTO-KU HTM-27W

Answers on a postcard for what KU might stand for!

Kill Urbies?


http://www.sarna.net/wiki/Hatamoto-Chi

Could be:
Chi - Earth
Hi - Fire
Kaze - Wind
Mizo - Water
Ku - Void

#47 MechaBattler

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Survivor
  • Survivor
  • 4,840 posts

Posted 10 December 2018 - 03:27 PM

Looks like the Charger is slightly smaller than the Hatamoto. Especially when you compare the two to the Awesome.

#48 Chados

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,933 posts
  • LocationSomewhere...over the Rainbow

Posted 11 December 2018 - 07:22 PM

Like the HTM. It seems fairly tanky and agile. Please do not tweak its staying power or mobility.

Just one gripe-vertical arm movement is glitched. You can’t move arms up and down til the torso is at max pitch. Looks like the arm pitch values dropped a decimal somewhere. This was also noted in the general discussion.

#49 Laser Kiwi

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Shredder
  • Shredder
  • 186 posts

Posted 11 December 2018 - 09:12 PM

Hatamoto chi arm actuators suck and they are really loose and hard to aim as well as being sideways and only vertical at top of torso pitch.

And when i say loose i mean like they have an inbuilt acceleration and deceleration level that makes it hard to aim.

In the meantime might play with locked arms quite a bit

Edited by Laser Kiwi, 11 December 2018 - 09:13 PM.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users