The6thMessenger, on 29 January 2019 - 12:14 AM, said:
It's not what you think, I don't have beef with lights.
That being said, I recently had a match where a certain deadly-hammer-strikee -- a MPL Grinner shamed me for blocking him, in which I don't know what the **** happened. I did
He said "he should have legged me". He is THAT salty.
I think i was in front the entire time when I was brawling, blocking his shots. It's something you would expect when someone is brawling with others.
This is a complex one. But you seem to be looking for some verdict here - as a 3M driver, I play in the light style but interface a lot with assaults, and spend a lot of time in rear areas watching teams interact (Hint, not my own). So I'll give you my take.
On the one hand, right of way is situational. If I'm in a situation/area that Assaults are operating in, I try to defer to them. These situations are generally weapons free, front towards enemy scenarios - long and mid range slugging fest.
In most other situations, especially flanking and side peeks, and
in unobserved rear angle scenarios, Lights/Mediums have the right of way, because they are best able to create an advantage in those situations by virtue of speed. If you are an assault mech that finds themselves in that situation, you should defer to the light, because their awareness is generally better, but also, this is their bread and butter. This is where they earn their points. When I see an assault go off on their own and go for sniper shots from the side or worse, spend 6 minutes lugging it behind a hill, I shake my head and actively avoid supporting them, because it'll get me killed, and because encouraging that is just sabotaging my fellow medi-lights.
Finally, RE the deference question in those situations: I will trust the opinion of a light or medium as to fire/not fire over that of
any assault or heavy primary.
On the other hand, if he is in a situation in which he is sharing a peeking space with an Assault, then one of two things has occurred:
Either you, as assault, are way far forward and thus doing something wrong, or he is operating near the front line for direct attack, in which case he is doing something wrong, as that is an inefficient zone for lights to be in unless its mop-up time.
As to the question of who revealed their presence: He has some justification here, as he had brought the appropriate weapon, MPLs are one of the least noticeable weapons in the game other than SPLs
Angel of Annihilation, on 29 January 2019 - 09:07 AM, said:
It is your job to support the heavier mech, not vice versa.
I regularly consult my match score, and I am nearly always in a light/medium mech.
I have never gotten the impression that I was at any point supporting a heavier mech. I have never ended a match and thought to myself "Wow, that assault really clinched that victory."
In fact, the numbers on the board usually render the opposite result.
So, in summary, I do not, as a medium, exist to support assault mechs, instead, I would counter with my own philosophy:
Assault mechs exist to provide distractions and armor damage so that I can run around and wreck the enemy from the rear and win the match.
By the same token, when I face a gaggle of assault mechs at the end of a match as the last man standing, I ignore my teammates assertions the the game is over because I'm trapped in a match with massive tonnage difference.
I am not trapped in the there with them.
They are trapped in there with me.
Edited by Insignus, 29 January 2019 - 11:25 PM.