Edited by Shadowomega1, 09 March 2019 - 12:09 PM.


Dear Alex
Started by Internal Obedience XIII-omega, Mar 05 2019 07:49 PM
26 replies to this topic
#21
Posted 09 March 2019 - 12:06 PM
The Warhammer IIC should be about 2.5% taller(Going into the legs), and 5% with more back(Torso Depth), doesn't need to be wider, as the IIC already has thicker legs.
#22
Posted 09 March 2019 - 06:21 PM
Koniving, on 09 March 2019 - 11:44 AM, said:
Anyway got a shot of said feet?
https://mwomercs.com...-warhammer-iic/

As noted, it is missing the heel as seen here.

https://mwomercs.com...mer-iic-release
Thing is, their screenshots showed it with its current size in the countdown thread. It would appear many forget it is an 80 ton assault mech and not a heavy. They would rather scale it up than scale down the other mechs...

Edited by Tarl Cabot, 09 March 2019 - 06:35 PM.
#23
Posted 09 March 2019 - 06:29 PM
You'd think that would be pretty obvious
#24
Posted 11 March 2019 - 01:56 AM
Tina Benoit, on 08 March 2019 - 04:19 PM, said:
Hey guys, this issue isn't related to Alex as he is the concept artist.
However a corrected version of the Warhammer IIC will be released in the next patch. A version error occurred where the wrong ‘Mech model was released and we are going to correct it in the patch. This addresses the feet and overall size error of what’s on live.
We apologize for the slip up and work to ensure it doesn’t happen again.
However a corrected version of the Warhammer IIC will be released in the next patch. A version error occurred where the wrong ‘Mech model was released and we are going to correct it in the patch. This addresses the feet and overall size error of what’s on live.
We apologize for the slip up and work to ensure it doesn’t happen again.
Any chance to also remove the "hooks" on the arms when there are no PPC's installed? Cose when the arms are empty or with lasers and such, it just looks fugly..
#25
Posted 11 March 2019 - 02:56 AM
I honestly did not notice anything wrong with the feet . Now i need to go look at that . XD
#26
Posted 11 March 2019 - 01:59 PM
Soooooo you guys gonna give it armour? Or mobility? This thing's CT is going to get absolutely massive when you scale it up and it's going to need some tweaks to not suck. Right now the WHM-IIC is in a great spot because, while it has little by way of agility or durability, it has its small size working wonderfully for it
#27
Posted 11 March 2019 - 02:02 PM
The Mayor of Smuttington, on 11 March 2019 - 01:59 PM, said:
Soooooo you guys gonna give it armour? Or mobility? This thing's CT is going to get absolutely massive when you scale it up and it's going to need some tweaks to not suck. Right now the WHM-IIC is in a great spot because, while it has little by way of agility or durability, it has its small size working wonderfully for it
Seeing how some mechs got no compensation for size increases during the rescale, and how some like the Blackjack even got quirk nerfs after having their physical size inflated, the answer is lolno. Expect no compensation.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users