Jump to content

Pts Shutting Down For Now - April 10


5 replies to this topic

#1 Paul Inouye

    Lead Designer

  • Developer
  • Developer
  • 2,815 posts
  • LocationVancouver, BC

Posted 10 April 2019 - 05:02 PM

I posted this in the Dev Outreach PTS thread but I want to make sure it's as visible as possible for everyone trying to help out.

View PostPaul Inouye, on 10 April 2019 - 04:48 PM, said:

Bleh....

I'm going to throw in the towel here for a bit. I'm going to have PTS shut down. There is no point if the game is locking players out with this Error 63 issue which appears on external servers but not internal (which is where QA tests) servers. I don't have an ETA on when it will be back up, this Error 63 HAS to be fixed before I'm willing to give it a thumbs up for a re-try.

That being said, when it comes to the rewards and event, I'm making the following change to the requirements:

- As a thank you to everyone who tried to help out with testing (we did get some good data), anyone who went through the motion of logging in will receive all rewards outlined in Matt's post about PTS and the number of matches played requirement is getting chopped. This includes anyone from Monday 4PM when we put PTS online, onward to today.

I want to thank everyone for their efforts on trying to get us performance/feature data. We do have data showing us how the 12v12 teams were assembled in terms of group size and how it dealt with group sizes and making teams in descending team size order. We also have data on what transpires on a phase change and that seems to be working okay outside of this Error 63 spam.

For transparency, the Error 63 spam I'm talking about is something that is going wrong after a phase change and it's causing a major hit on the backend database. This spam (almost like a DDoS) is locking threads and tables which causes the erratic behavior of kicking people/not allowing logins etc.

I apologize for the up and down status of PTS and will notify as soon as I get more information as to the cause and potential fixes for this problem.

-Paul


#2 The6thMessenger

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Nova Captain
  • Nova Captain
  • 8,104 posts
  • LocationFrom a distance in an Urbie with a HAG, delivering righteous fury to heretics.

Posted 10 April 2019 - 05:11 PM

Fine. At least you're fixing it.

Would have been fun to play.

And please, please oh please, allow Clans to play.

Also I don't want to go buy, kit, and organize meta-mechs again. I just bought three Black Widows and Two Warhammers for a Dakka and Gauss-Vomit build respectively for my IS-Dech, and bought another Esprit De-Corps, a Virago for my Clan-Deck (cause I didn't know it was just IS only before).

Edited by The6thMessenger, 10 April 2019 - 05:14 PM.


#3 Paul Inouye

    Lead Designer

  • Developer
  • Developer
  • 2,815 posts
  • LocationVancouver, BC

Posted 10 April 2019 - 05:14 PM

Reward link for all of those who logged into PTS: https://mwomercs.com/profile/content

Remember, the number of matches played is no longer a requirement. If you were able to log in, you will get full rewards.

#4 Void Angel

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Marauder
  • The Marauder
  • 7,174 posts
  • LocationParanoiaville

Posted 10 April 2019 - 09:31 PM



#5 Bowelhacker

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Hero of Marik
  • Hero of Marik
  • 922 posts
  • LocationKooken's Pleasure Pit

Posted 11 April 2019 - 04:10 PM

View PostPaul Inouye, on 10 April 2019 - 05:14 PM, said:

Reward link for all of those who logged into PTS: https://mwomercs.com/profile/content Remember, the number of matches played is no longer a requirement. If you were able to log in, you will get full rewards.


And if we weren't able to log in?

#6 slide

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 1,768 posts
  • LocationKersbrook South Australia

Posted 14 April 2019 - 03:44 PM

View PostBowelhacker, on 11 April 2019 - 04:10 PM, said:


And if we weren't able to log in?


Then bad luck I suppose. If you weren't logged in then how are PGI supposed to know who was or wasn't trying to participate.

I mean are PGI supposed to give the 99% of players who had no intention of participating the reward just because you (and a few others) had bad luck logging in? I think they are being generous removing the 4 game limit as is.

Edited by slide, 14 April 2019 - 03:45 PM.






2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users