66 replies to this topic

[Nightbird]

RACs do enough damage per trigger pull

GL with getting your ask, not gonna happen tho

[The6thMessenger]

Nightbird, on 20 June 2019 - 03:59 PM, said:

RACs do enough damage per trigger pull

Sure, meanwhile not TT, so you just lost there.

Nightbird, on 20 June 2019 - 03:59 PM, said:

GL with getting your ask, not gonna happen tho

Thanks I guess.

PGI has a motherlode of bad-ideas, they had bad track record, and MWO weapons bad implementation and bad balance. If you think you won by defaulting to PGI? Really we all lost.

Edited by The6thMessenger, 20 June 2019 - 04:12 PM.

[Nightbird]

The6thMessenger, on 20 June 2019 - 04:01 PM, said:

PGI has a motherlode of bad-ideas, they had bad track record, and MWO weapons bad implementation and bad balance. If you think you won by defaulting to PGI? Really we all lost.

Making a LBX5 not do 5 damage is a much worse idea than PGI's normal bad ideas though... especially when spread or cooldown tweak can easily fix the weapon

[The6thMessenger]

Nightbird, on 20 June 2019 - 04:16 PM, said:

Making a LBX5 not do 5 damage is a much worse idea than PGI's normal bad ideas though... especially when spread or cooldown tweak can easily fix the weapon

Lol. K.

[LordNothing]

FupDup, on 20 June 2019 - 02:56 PM, said:

The AC/10 and LB 10-X have a slightly faster shooting rate compared to the UAC/10 single-tap mode. We could perhaps proliferate that to the 2, 5, and 20 sized ACs.

i like this idea.

though i like to point out that an lb-10 has size/tonnage advantage over their respective ac that the other lbs dont have. so those should get a little extra. giving the other acs a boost as well would certainly help the 5 and 20, though not sure the 2 needs it. and i wouldnt mind having crit splitting to help the lb20 fit into more mechs.

Edited by LordNothing, 20 June 2019 - 05:51 PM.

[crazytimes]

LordNothing, on 20 June 2019 - 05:50 PM, said:

i like this idea.

though i like to point out that an lb-10 has size/tonnage advantage over their respective ac that the other lbs dont have. so those should get a little extra. giving the other acs a boost as well would certainly help the 5 and 20, though not sure the 2 needs it. and i wouldnt mind having crit splitting to help the lb20 fit into more mechs.

The LB10 is some kind of lore thing that must be so from what I understand. Changing it would upset the lore fanatic, which is always a bad idea.

[LordNothing]

crazytimes, on 21 June 2019 - 01:58 AM, said:

The LB10 is some kind of lore thing that must be so from what I understand. Changing it would upset the lore fanatic, which is always a bad idea.

i understand that. but the is lb-10 is the only lbx gun that offers proper tradeoffs. its unique and should not be used as a baseline. i do like the relationship between the is 10 and the clan 10, is getting better max range and velocity, and the clan version being lighter/smaller. both get a cooldown buff over their equivalent uacs. the 10 class most certainly should not be the baseline for the others. this is the point i was trying to make.

the 2s and 20s are in a good place, though id like to see a buff to the is 20 to compensate for the need to run an std engine, give me a reason to use it over the hgauss. perhaps the spread of a 10 or a cd buff.

i think both ac5s and lb5s need a 1.5s cd. and you might want to reduce the ac5 gh limit to 4 or 5 so this is not a direct buff to ac5 boats. also a gh limit of 6 doesnt make sense as there are no mechs that can carry more than 6 (well there is the ultraviolet but you have to strip a lot of armor and will have an ammo shortage, 7 with full armor and 2 tons ammo).

Edited by LordNothing, 21 June 2019 - 10:55 AM.