Jump to content

Faction Play Leaderboards - Discussion 1


23 replies to this topic

Poll: Leaderboard Dataset (50 member(s) have cast votes)

Which set of data should be used for leaderboards?

  1. Complete historical data from CW Phase 3 (16 votes [32.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 32.00%

  2. New data that starts when the next feature (Loyalists) goes live. (34 votes [68.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 68.00%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 Paul Inouye

    Lead Designer

  • Developer
  • Developer
  • 2,791 posts
  • LocationVancouver, BC

Posted 02 August 2019 - 04:55 PM

Work is progressing right now on getting the FP Leaderboards populated again.

First implementation is to refill what is currently in the client.

Next steps however is updating this to make it more relevant to the incoming Loyalist update as well as Merc Unit updates.

Some initial information:

We have historical data that tracks back to CW Phase 3 when the latest big implementation was done.

We now have the ability to reset stat tracking to whenever we push the next big feature implementation (Loyalist gameplay).

My first question to the community:

When it comes to the leaderboards, which set of data would be wanted the most?

#2 Prototelis

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Shredder
  • Shredder
  • 3,185 posts

Posted 02 August 2019 - 05:25 PM

Wins > KMDD > Average damage seem the most important to me.

It might also be nice if there was a section with performance per class like the QP leaderboards.

#3 NeirSolon

    Member

  • Pip
  • The People's Hero
  • 16 posts

Posted 02 August 2019 - 09:10 PM

Just make sure any stats presented are done with per match correction.

Saying person A has 100 wins to person B's 50 doesn't mean anything if A is batting 100 out of 1000 and B 50 out of 50.

And remove any scouting from the tallies.

#4 Prototelis

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Shredder
  • Shredder
  • 3,185 posts

Posted 02 August 2019 - 11:01 PM

One thing I would really love though, is if faction stats were included in the API so it can be incorporated into services like the Jarls list.

#5 Sigmar Sich

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Veteran Founder
  • Veteran Founder
  • 960 posts
  • LocationUkraine, Kyiv

Posted 03 August 2019 - 09:16 AM

IMO, start anew. New changes = new board.
But with some archive boards as well. For nothing to be forgotten.

Or just simply a new one. You did delete all the stats from the olden phases, so why the recent phase is any special?

Or better yet, start counting it per season, as with general stats.

#6 Kinski Orlawisch

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Mercenary
  • The Mercenary
  • 2,200 posts
  • LocationHH

Posted 05 August 2019 - 01:35 AM

I would like to have the full leaderboard back. Our unit shows LIAO....but we havnt been there most of the time.
I mastered 4 factions ...Yes I want the full leaderboard.

#7 Paul Meyers DEST

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • Bridesmaid
  • Bridesmaid
  • 96 posts

Posted 05 August 2019 - 01:36 AM

That data that need no or less work to import. Put your time into more important things.

#8 Kinski Orlawisch

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Mercenary
  • The Mercenary
  • 2,200 posts
  • LocationHH

Posted 05 August 2019 - 02:12 AM

...Sorry..I m shure they lost them and this request is just done with the aim to say..You didn t want them..so we deleted them.

I m shure acc to the past that we got em here with their pants down.

Sorry..Thats a bit evil..but to make a patch wich didn t improve but broke CW....made me that way.

Dont misunderstand me..I love this gam,e..but atm PGI seems to destroy it.

#9 tee5

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 354 posts

Posted 05 August 2019 - 03:06 AM

And what is with the DATA of the 3 months I played Faction Play but were the leaderboards were broken.

Can we include these DATA as well?

#10 Davegt27

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 6,232 posts
  • LocationCO

Posted 05 August 2019 - 03:41 AM

I would vote for and push for a more team focused leader board

for sure no matter what you do someone will not like it but you guys are probably used to that

#11 Nathan White

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Deadly
  • The Deadly
  • 367 posts

Posted 05 August 2019 - 05:07 AM

Simple decision:
- Just create API to receive raw data about FP matches. Community can create own leaderboard.

EDIT: More simpler - give to us csv (or json) file one time of every day.
Something like this
(Player, MatchID, MatchTime, GameMode(Siege, Assault, etc) ,Faction, UnitTag, WinLoseStatus, Kills, KMMD, SoloKills, KillAssist, Damage(sum), Damage per type (laser, ballistics, etc), TeamDamage, TeamKills (for fun),
MechsInDropdeck(Mech1, Mech2, Mech3, Mech4), etc)

Edited by Nathan White, 05 August 2019 - 05:28 AM.


#12 Charles Sennet

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Predator
  • The Predator
  • 245 posts
  • LocationCurrently obscured by ECM

Posted 05 August 2019 - 12:52 PM

The current columns are pretty good. While I would love to know what my average damage is adding it to the board is risky as a lot of players will refuse to cap on Conquest or do other objective-based things.

Average team damage on the other hand would be a great addition. Team Kills not so much because you can do 1 dmg and be unlucky and kill a teammate.

#13 Nightbird

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Soviet
  • The Soviet
  • 4,632 posts

Posted 05 August 2019 - 01:07 PM

Restart data, do it monthly like with QP. The player base can do the aggregate on our own if you release the data like with QP.

#14 tee5

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 354 posts

Posted 05 August 2019 - 02:03 PM

Cool thing is that the poll is 50% vs 50%.

There is no real majority. If you do A, the people from B will complain. If you do B the people from A will complain.

#15 C H E E K I E Z

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Rage
  • Rage
  • 507 posts

Posted 05 August 2019 - 02:27 PM

Your missing the most important stats. Honestly....

Narc kills
Missiles destroyed

#16 Aivazovsky

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • The Soviet
  • The Soviet
  • 94 posts

Posted 06 August 2019 - 12:54 AM

View PostC H E E K I E Z, on 05 August 2019 - 02:27 PM, said:

Your missing the most important stats. Honestly....

Narc kills
Missiles destroyed

Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image

#17 Kinski Orlawisch

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Mercenary
  • The Mercenary
  • 2,200 posts
  • LocationHH

Posted 06 August 2019 - 03:03 PM

Airstrike and Artillery dmg?

#18 BROARL

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 168 posts
  • Locationinvasion

Posted 06 August 2019 - 03:31 PM

thankyou for asking what we want but may I suggest bringing back the annoying call-to-arms because without actually being able to play any games the leaderboard is basically redundant.

i would like to see DAMAGE TAKEN at the end of a match just as we see DAMAGE DONE, but as far as leaderboards go it need only show KILLS and KMDDs and WINS and I imagine monthly is fine is it not?

there are no prizes for first place or anything are there? what am i missing?

Edited by BROARL, 07 August 2019 - 03:40 AM.


#19 Geewiz 27

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • The Death Wish
  • The Death Wish
  • 92 posts

Posted 06 August 2019 - 05:19 PM

View PostPrototelis, on 02 August 2019 - 05:25 PM, said:

Wins > KMDD > Average damage seem the most important to me.

It might also be nice if there was a section with performance per class like the QP leaderboards.

^^^^^^^ This and just start fresh with maybe historical being able to be viewed.

#20 Bad Electric

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Heavy Lifter
  • Heavy Lifter
  • 173 posts
  • LocationChantilly Va

Posted 12 August 2019 - 04:17 AM

And when is this patch/implementation being rolled out?





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users