I just kind of wonder why nobody arund me at Polar "Loving" Highlands didn't run long range builds. I mean IS erll is longer, mechs are tougher, there are some good and cheap high mount options for IS. Yet I keep seeing some dudes trying to medium range hillhump. They always lose face in the process.


Is Why No Long Range?
Started by Sneaky Ohgoorchik, Sep 26 2019 01:25 AM
3 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 26 September 2019 - 01:25 AM
#2
Posted 26 September 2019 - 03:18 AM
That is because of an event.
You get ALL the HOTAS users filling the queues and bringing totally useless mechs...
But you know, FP/Groups are the "problem" for bringing proper builds...
You get ALL the HOTAS users filling the queues and bringing totally useless mechs...
But you know, FP/Groups are the "problem" for bringing proper builds...
#3
Posted 26 September 2019 - 02:24 PM
Also by default cERLL (740/1480) has a longer reach then isERLL (675/1350). Where it starts to get muddy are quirks, IS mechs have more quirks then Clan mechs, then followed by a player's decision on what nodes to take in the Skill Tree.
cERLL (740m/1480m) 10.75dmg @ 740m
isERLL (675m/1350m) and 9dmg @ 675m / 742..5m w/10% range quirk.
For those mechs with 10% energy range quirk - 742.5m / 1485m
Of 103 mechs, 12 Clan mechs have 2.5% to 5% energy range quirks. Of the IS mechs it looked about even between 5%-10% energy range quirks, then with only the Atlas K with a 15% energy range quirk....
cERLL (740m/1480m) 10.75dmg @ 740m
isERLL (675m/1350m) and 9dmg @ 675m / 742..5m w/10% range quirk.
For those mechs with 10% energy range quirk - 742.5m / 1485m
Of 103 mechs, 12 Clan mechs have 2.5% to 5% energy range quirks. Of the IS mechs it looked about even between 5%-10% energy range quirks, then with only the Atlas K with a 15% energy range quirk....
Edited by Tarl Cabot, 26 September 2019 - 02:34 PM.
#4
Posted 26 September 2019 - 03:02 PM
Yeah, pilots who know how FP plays would be rolling out Battlemasters and Stalkers.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users