Jump to content

Mrm Meta

BattleMechs Metagame Loadout

22 replies to this topic

#21 LordNothing

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 16,786 posts

Posted 16 August 2022 - 10:21 PM

View Postmartian, on 15 August 2022 - 07:40 PM, said:

The PGI's forum rules explicitly require the forum users to do so.


ive also seen the moderation staff state the opposite. example.

the nature of this thread presents old information which i dont think is relevant to the current state of balance. to call mrms "the current meta" is grossly out of date.

Edited by LordNothing, 16 August 2022 - 10:26 PM.


#22 martian

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 7,797 posts

Posted 16 August 2022 - 11:13 PM

View PostLordNothing, on 16 August 2022 - 10:21 PM, said:

ive also seen the moderation staff state the opposite. example.

the nature of this thread presents old information which i dont think is relevant to the current state of balance. to call mrms "the current meta" is grossly out of date.

I was quoting the actual site rules and what is written in them in black and white.

#23 Ekson Valdez

    Volunteer Moderator

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 696 posts

Posted 16 August 2022 - 11:40 PM




martian likely refers to

Code of Conduct said:

  • Creating forum threads about existing topics.

This is meant to prevent several concurrent topics with discussion on the same matter.
However, threads that have been inactive for a long time most likely contain information that does not reflect the current game environment.
Therefore, reviving such old threads by posting on them is regarded as

Code of Conduct said:

  • Communicating non-constructive comments.

and will be moderated.
If you want to have a discssion about the current implementation of MRMs, please open a new topic on the matter.

Thank you. This thread will now be locked.








2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users