Hmgs
#1
Posted 15 December 2020 - 05:56 PM
Trtying them on a Huugin, 4 of them (1-1/2 tons ammo + nodes). and I feel like i'm burning through ammo WAY faster than LMGs and not really doing anything else of value with them over the LMGs.
What I am missing here.
Yes I am in optimal range.
Open components are not being destroyed any quicker and possibly even slower than 4 LMGs
#2
Posted 15 December 2020 - 07:03 PM
i've used ember and I find hmgs do dmg significantly faster than lmgs. The part part is being in range and firing at open mechs. I tend to burn half my ammo on still armored mechs.
#3
Posted 15 December 2020 - 08:05 PM
At 100m, 4HMG is doing 6dps - that drops off to 0 at 200m, that is still 50m short of LMGs optimal range where they are doing 2.4dps. The cross over point where LMG do more damage is about 160m if my maths is good. If you're not in the face brawling constantly, you're going to struggle to get more DPS out of HMG.
If you're facetanking with a Raven... you may not be doing Raven right.
Edited by crazytimes, 15 December 2020 - 08:06 PM.
#4
Posted 15 December 2020 - 11:41 PM
#5
Posted 15 December 2020 - 11:50 PM
Bigbacon, on 15 December 2020 - 05:56 PM, said:
Trtying them on a Huugin, 4 of them (1-1/2 tons ammo + nodes). and I feel like i'm burning through ammo WAY faster than LMGs and not really doing anything else of value with them over the LMGs.
What I am missing here.
Yes I am in optimal range.
Open components are not being destroyed any quicker and possibly even slower than 4 LMGs
I noticed this myself.. I dunno if its a ping issue my end or me but heavy machine guns seem way more inferior to light on internals.. At least in inner sphere mechs.. Their range is far shorter as well..
#6
Posted 16 December 2020 - 07:43 AM
JediPanther, on 15 December 2020 - 07:03 PM, said:
i've used ember and I find hmgs do dmg significantly faster than lmgs. The part part is being in range and firing at open mechs. I tend to burn half my ammo on still armored mechs.
it is...what else would I do with it. but it has 4 MG slots so why not use them.
crazytimes, on 15 December 2020 - 08:05 PM, said:
At 100m, 4HMG is doing 6dps - that drops off to 0 at 200m, that is still 50m short of LMGs optimal range where they are doing 2.4dps. The cross over point where LMG do more damage is about 160m if my maths is good. If you're not in the face brawling constantly, you're going to struggle to get more DPS out of HMG.
If you're facetanking with a Raven... you may not be doing Raven right.
It works fine getting in close when you need too. I'm not face tanking just cause. open stuff up, find other angles, and try to use the MGs.
JediPanther, on 15 December 2020 - 07:03 PM, said:
i've used ember and I find hmgs do dmg significantly faster than lmgs. The part part is being in range and firing at open mechs. I tend to burn half my ammo on still armored mechs.
well I run my ember with 2x AC2s so.....Its got big nipples. I am a sucker for weird, silly, junk builds some times.
#7
Posted 17 December 2020 - 12:27 AM
#8
Posted 17 December 2020 - 02:10 AM
crazytimes, on 15 December 2020 - 08:05 PM, said:
Did you take spread into account? It's one of the biggest reason why I don't use HMG aside from ammo shortage is short range.
HMG's spread is at 1.0, to put that into perspective even LB20X is at 1 spread, LB10X is at 0.9 spread. The Light MG is at 0.5 Spread, MG spread is at 0.6. ( Source: https://mwomercs.com.../list/full.json )
Edited by The6thMessenger, 17 December 2020 - 02:14 AM.
#9
Posted 17 December 2020 - 05:48 AM
#10
Posted 17 December 2020 - 05:34 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users