Jump to content

Racs = Worse Now?


25 replies to this topic

#21 Ken Harkin

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 388 posts
  • LocationLong Island, New York, USA

Posted 10 January 2024 - 06:32 AM

Frankly RACs should have no spread. They deal their damage OVER TIME. If a RAC 5 is putting out 11DPS and the target is moving the damage should already be spreading. You also have projectile speed to account for. On top of that there is the blinding muzzle flash.

The whole justification for eliminating HAG spread was the shots hit over a protracted period, roughly 1 second for a HAG 40.

If a potato is going to stand there and let lasers and HAG burn through single locations then RACs should be the same.

#22 PocketYoda

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Shredder
  • Shredder
  • 4,147 posts
  • LocationAustralia

Posted 10 January 2024 - 01:54 PM

Racs by design have always been worse..

#23 Curccu

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Liquid Metal
  • Liquid Metal
  • 4,623 posts

Posted 10 January 2024 - 11:32 PM

View PostKen Harkin, on 10 January 2024 - 06:32 AM, said:

Frankly RACs should have no spread. They deal their damage OVER TIME. If a RAC 5 is putting out 11DPS and the target is moving the damage should already be spreading. You also have projectile speed to account for. On top of that there is the blinding muzzle flash.

The whole justification for eliminating HAG spread was the shots hit over a protracted period, roughly 1 second for a HAG 40.

If a potato is going to stand there and let lasers and HAG burn through single locations then RACs should be the same.


"I also don't believe minor spread is a good thing(for this reason I plan on making a case for RAC spread removal to the Cauldron in the near future), either big spread or no spread is what I prefer." -Frost_Byte
Source


View PostPocketYoda, on 10 January 2024 - 01:54 PM, said:

Racs by design have always been worse..

..than?





3 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users