Semi-serious post, since some people seem genuinely confused and others think it's SRS BSNS.
Deceptor, on 01 August 2012 - 07:00 PM, said:
Nope, it's not but even if it were, that would not be correct.
Khanahar, on 01 August 2012 - 04:51 PM, said:
As a classics student, I feel the need to point out that "Atlas" as in the name of the Titan, is a proper name and therefore has no plural declension in the original Greek or its Latin derivatives. We cannot extrapolate plural endings from similar words in the classical languages. As a result, "Atlases" is surely the correct answer, referring to multiples of the "Atlas." Unless you're speaking in another language, in which case you should follow local convention.
As a former Classics student who could now teach Ancient Greek and Classical Latin... no. Names do definitely decline and while it's unusual to need to pluralize them, it happens ("I saw the two Jennifers this morning") and we know how to do so. Atlantes is the correct 'original' plural.
Tussock, on 01 August 2012 - 08:16 PM, said:
So...
Octopus => Octopi
Cactus => Cacti
Radius => Radii
Hippopotamus => Hippopotami
How about anu$? It's a latin word right? If you saw more than one, would they be anii?
Close, but it's octopods for the octopus and Hippopotamoi, technically, for the final one. In English, though, not really; octopuses and hippopotamuses.
Demona, on 01 August 2012 - 08:38 PM, said:
Actually the proper plural for an octopus is octopuses. Octopi is an acceptable alternate, but not the traditional plural form.
Nope, not really. It's a just a classic example of hypercorrection.