

My Beast - 980x, 4x 680's
#1
Posted 07 August 2012 - 08:23 AM
✔ Intel Core i7 980x - 4.8GHz / 6 Core
✔ [ASUS] 4x GTX680 2GB Quad-SLI
✔ G.Skill Ripjaws 6GB DDR3 2000mhz
✔ ASUS X58 Rampage III Extreme 4-Way SLI @ ASUS ROG Expander
✔ 3x Corsair Performance Pro 256GB, 1x Corsair Force GT 120GB, 1x Seagate Barracuda
✔ Dell u3011
✔ Seasonic 1050w
✔ Heatkiller / 3x 360 RAD & 1x 120 RAD
✔ Logitech G930 Headset
✔ Logitech G300 Mouse
✔ Windows 7 Professional Edition 64 bit
imgur PC images: http://wint0nic.imgur.com/
The clocks for my 680's are all at 1300mhz, and my processor is at 4.8ghz. Game looks great, but future it will support SLi.
#2
Posted 07 August 2012 - 08:26 AM
#3
Posted 07 August 2012 - 08:29 AM

Edited by DocBach, 07 August 2012 - 08:29 AM.
#4
Posted 07 August 2012 - 08:30 AM
#5
Posted 07 August 2012 - 08:30 AM
@Fomorian, about 7k with everything.
DocBach, on 07 August 2012 - 08:29 AM, said:

Actually bro, SLi mirrors the ram so I only have 2 gygs available, but still, games don't use more then 2 gyg's, not even Crysis 2, and I play on a 2560x1600 resolution.
Edited by wint0nic, 07 August 2012 - 08:32 AM.
#6
Posted 07 August 2012 - 08:34 AM
What you need to do is take that thing into work to 'show it off' but really put a GPU Bitcoin Miner on it and use it to 'recover' some of that $7k.
#7
Posted 07 August 2012 - 08:36 AM
on a serious note, even though its a bit too rich for my taste i love the final look of the build.
#8
Posted 07 August 2012 - 08:39 AM
wint0nic, on 07 August 2012 - 08:30 AM, said:
@Fomorian, about 7k with everything.
Actually bro, SLi mirrors the ram so I only have 2 gygs available, but still, games don't use more then 2 gyg's, not even Crysis 2, and I play on a 2560x1600 resolution.
Nice to see someone who understands how SLI works

Can you link any articles regarding the amount of memory affecting overclock ability? I'd never heard that one and it might explain some differences i'm seeing between 2 machines i'm currently working on.
*edit* also, im only seeing 3-way sli in that monster and was also also wondering - why not 2 X 690?
Edited by Giverous, 07 August 2012 - 08:41 AM.
#9
Posted 07 August 2012 - 08:46 AM
#10
Posted 07 August 2012 - 09:45 AM
Edited by Astarot, 07 August 2012 - 09:49 AM.
#11
Posted 07 August 2012 - 12:44 PM
Giverous, on 07 August 2012 - 08:39 AM, said:

I been overclocking for 10 years so in all the tests I've ran, the more RAM you have the harder it is to overclock. I'm sure I can link you to an article. If anybody has battlefield, I also have that as well. What are the specs for your Maruder? I never took pictures of getting the 4th one, I redid with a 4th one and added a ROG Expander, that is how I achieved 4way on RIII. When I had 12 gygs of ram, max stable overclock was 4.4, cut down to 6gygs and was able to achieve 4.8 stable.
Edited by wint0nic, 07 August 2012 - 12:53 PM.
#12
Posted 07 August 2012 - 03:07 PM
#13
Posted 08 August 2012 - 07:05 AM
#14
Posted 08 August 2012 - 07:57 AM
I too have an I7 860. It is an 8 core version.
Nice speed on the latest generation of I7.
http://ark.intel.com...-GTs-Intel-QPI) Yours
http://ark.intel.com...Cache-2_80-GHz) Mine.
Specifications
[color=#515357]
Essentials
Status Launched
Launch Date Q1'10
Processor Number i7-980X
# of Cores 6
# of Threads 12
Clock Speed 3.33 GHz
Max Turbo Frequency 3.6 GHz
Intel® Smart Cache 12 MB
Bus/Core Ratio 25
Intel® QPI Speed 6.4 GT/s
# of QPI Links 1
Instruction Set 64-bit
Instruction Set Extensions SSE4.2
Embedded Options Available

Lithography 32 nm
Max TDP 130 W
VID Voltage Range 0.800V-1.375V
Recommended Customer Price TRAY: $999
BOX : $1059
Datasheet Url Link [/color]
[color=#515357]
Memory Specifications
Max Memory Size (dependent on memory type) 24 GB
Memory Types DDR3-1066
# of Memory Channels 3
Max Memory Bandwidth 25.6 GB/s
Physical Address Extensions 36-bit
ECC Memory Supported

[color=#515357]
Graphics Specifications
Integrated Graphics

[color=#515357]
Package Specifications
Max CPU Configuration 1
TCASE 67.9°C
Package Size 42.5mm X 45.0mm
Processing Die Size 239 mm2
Sockets Supported FCLGA1366
Low Halogen Options Available See MDDS [/color]
[color=#515357]
Advanced Technologies
Intel® Turbo Boost Technology [color=#FFFFFF]Yes[/color]
Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology

Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)

Intel® Trusted Execution Technology

AES New Instructions

Intel® 64

Idle States [color=#FFFFFF]Yes[/color]
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology

Intel® Demand Based Switching No
Thermal Monitoring Technologies No
Execute Disable Bit [color=#FFFFFF]Yes[/color]
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) [color=#FFFFFF]Yes[/color] [/color]
Edited by ORIGINAL SteelWolf, 08 August 2012 - 08:00 AM.
#15
Posted 08 August 2012 - 08:08 AM
#16
Posted 08 August 2012 - 08:19 AM
Articles:
http://www.google.co...Bi4hnDXpCii3yeg
http://www.theverge....erformance-test
Anything else?
Edited by wint0nic, 08 August 2012 - 08:20 AM.
#17
Posted 08 August 2012 - 08:24 AM
http://www.slashgear...d-sli-23219787/
Most games give great scaling for dual GPUs, but more often than not, the scaling will mirror what's seen there with 3dMark Vantage: the third and fourth GPU basically sitting around, twiddling their thumbs. Even 3dMark11, which seems to scale relative well, showed marginal gaines from the third and fourth card (2500 and 3500 points respectively, or put another way, a quarter of a full 680 and a third of a full 680, respectively).
That article shows that Crysis 2 does nothing with the third and fourth GPUs, either, except in situations of extreme resolution (basically, triple monitor setups). So MWO might (might, I stress), take advantage of a quad SLI setup, under certain circumstances. Most games will not.
From the sounds of it, a bunch of 7970s would have been the smarter purchase, as they scale better more of the time. Wint0nic's own article linked above (the second one) mentions as much. I still wouldn't consider it practical, but hey... who needs practical when you can stimulate the economy by buying ALL the GTX680s

Edited by Catamount, 08 August 2012 - 08:28 AM.
#18
Posted 08 August 2012 - 08:27 AM
#19
Posted 08 August 2012 - 08:52 AM
wint0nic, on 08 August 2012 - 08:27 AM, said:
Hey, fair enough,but then, this is probably why people are reacting negatively. When others have posted builds here, it's to show the end result of discussions and planning on these forums with the community, or to discuss upgrades, or to take pride in getting a system together for the first time. You're basically just boating about having thousands of dollars in disposable income.
Do I care? Not at all, by all means, go for it. I certainly am not going to congratulate you for having the money to buy uselessly extraneous hardware, but I won't criticize you for it either, nor will I for making a post about it. However, this is probably why some others are; epeen displays are generally looked down upon on forums, at least in my experience.
For my part, I hope the benchmarking goes well for you.
On a side note, why not upgrade to the highest Founder level? It's not like you won't use that in-game currency over the entire course of playing MWO. I certainly would -and quickly-, I just lack that kind of disposable income as a poor college student (oh how I yearn for my days of carefree moneymaking... oh well).
Edited by Catamount, 08 August 2012 - 08:53 AM.
#20
Posted 08 August 2012 - 09:49 AM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users