![](https://static.mwomercs.com/forums//public/style_images/master/icon_users.png)
![](https://mwomercs.com/static/img/house/piranha.png)
BattleMech 6 - Centurion
#21
Posted 25 January 2012 - 10:10 AM
#22
Posted 25 January 2012 - 10:11 AM
![:)](https://static.mwomercs.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/biggrin.png)
#23
Posted 25 January 2012 - 10:13 AM
Now dang nabbit get us a Marauder!
Cheers
#24
Posted 25 January 2012 - 10:13 AM
This just made my day a bit more tollerable.
![:)](https://static.mwomercs.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/smile.png)
#25
Posted 25 January 2012 - 10:13 AM
Only thing to think about is Ammo Ammo Ammo
#26
Posted 25 January 2012 - 10:14 AM
#27
Posted 25 January 2012 - 10:14 AM
#28
Posted 25 January 2012 - 10:14 AM
no head turn? arg, head piece was one of the coolest parts.
slimline torso? too anime
feet...yeah...
overall it just doesn't feel like MW. The chunkiness of the designs was part of the charm and the Atlas, hunchback, and dragon FD designs still show it, this...looks too much like an Arm Slave/Gundam.
FYI; because I love the mech so much, I will be 'that guy'
Edited by Aaron DeChavilier, 25 January 2012 - 10:15 AM.
#29
Posted 25 January 2012 - 10:14 AM
![:)](https://static.mwomercs.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/biggrin.png)
#30
Posted 25 January 2012 - 10:15 AM
While I love the CN9-A, and busted a nut to get one in MPBT3025, I'm not so sure about this one.
It's a fantastic revision of a classic mech, but the whole *toes* on the feet and the forearm vambrace/shield and shoulder baffle doesn't seem quite right.
But hey, another mech, woohoo!!
Summer can't get here soon enough.
Plus this looks like its the Beam variant rather than the AC10 version looking at the arm barrel.
+1 for FD and his artistic workings.
#31
Posted 25 January 2012 - 10:15 AM
#32
Posted 25 January 2012 - 10:16 AM
![:)](https://static.mwomercs.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/happy.png)
The design is so good and modern. I could see some problems with identification, but that is really just minor. Another great mech for us.
![:)](https://static.mwomercs.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/cool.png)
Edited by Adridos, 25 January 2012 - 10:20 AM.
#33
Posted 25 January 2012 - 10:16 AM
#34
Posted 25 January 2012 - 10:16 AM
...now really, where is the centurion?
Honestly not hating on FD's skill because I think it is an amazing picture based on the centurion but is most certainly not the centurion. (I understand wanting to reimagine the mechs but there comes a point when you need to go "ok yeah that is definitly something else")
RIP my friend http://ppc.warhawken...s/centurion.gif (even clansmen love the old mechs)
#35
Posted 25 January 2012 - 10:17 AM
#36
Posted 25 January 2012 - 10:18 AM
#37
Posted 25 January 2012 - 10:19 AM
The head I LIKE. Mechs don't need a cockpit mounted on a gimbal waving around out there waiting to be shot off. The sunken cockpit is a nice modernization.
Edited by BarHaid, 25 January 2012 - 10:35 AM.
#38
Posted 25 January 2012 - 10:19 AM
Amarus Cameron, on 25 January 2012 - 10:16 AM, said:
...now really, where is the centurion?
Honestly not hating on FD's skill because I think it is an amazing picture based on the centurion but is most certainly not the centurion. (I understand wanting to reimagine the mechs but there comes a point when you need to go "ok yeah that is definitly something else")
RIP my friend http://ppc.warhawken...s/centurion.gif (even clansmen love the old mechs)
So it is not an angry mob with sticks and pitchforks that will come at him. It will be a mob of Clans which hate the new IS design.
![:)](https://static.mwomercs.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/happy.png)
#39
Posted 25 January 2012 - 10:21 AM
![:)](https://static.mwomercs.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/huh.png)
Woah.
That was unexpected. That thing looks AGRESSIVE. Going to have fun repainting this thing.
#40
Posted 25 January 2012 - 10:22 AM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users