Jump to content

American's fickle? Accept V's revolution one moment, reject Bane's the next?


2 replies to this topic

#1 PaintedWolf

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Devoted
  • The Devoted
  • 1,114 posts

Posted 25 August 2012 - 12:16 AM

I am puzzled by that. V was technically a terrorist, a relatively, and I use that word very, very loosely, benign- like he didn't kill 100s of people (and those he did, it was fighting a totalitarian government.)

Whereas Bane, similar goals in substance, but not style. Why is one a hero and one a villain really?

#2 PaintedWolf

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Devoted
  • The Devoted
  • 1,114 posts

Posted 25 August 2012 - 01:53 AM

http://youtu.be/chqi8m4CEEY

vs.



#3 MrHacknslash

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 155 posts
  • LocationCrazy Town

Posted 25 August 2012 - 10:26 AM

I'm gonna go with the fact that V was starting a revolution, and only harming government officials in his war against an evil dictator while Bane was arbitrarily trying to kill thousands of innocent people in order to cleanse a city of evil and throw western civilization into chaos so that it would destroy itself (thus causing millions more deaths).





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users