Freelook and Track-IR
#41
Posted 09 March 2012 - 11:11 AM
#42
Posted 09 March 2012 - 11:46 AM
I've asked Garth about TrackIR support, but after the screenshots and gameplay video, i don't see how it can be useful to increase situational awareness significantly. It's not a shortage, since the most part of players doesn't have TrackIR.
Edited by Scar, 09 March 2012 - 11:47 AM.
#43
Posted 09 March 2012 - 11:51 AM
#44
Posted 09 March 2012 - 11:52 AM
Scar, on 09 March 2012 - 11:46 AM, said:
I've asked Garth about TrackIR support, but after the screenshots and gameplay video, i don't see how it can be useful to increase situational awareness significantly. It's not a shortage, since the most part of players doesn't have TrackIR.
I agree with this in part. With the recent footage, the vast majority of crucial information is on your screen. In the event you need to look at a instrumentation panel, quickly going into freelook and back out would be more than ample.
Having said that though, I still feel TrackIR would provide a deeper feeling of IMMERSION as that all your head movements are mimiced perfectly in the cockpit, making you feel like you are not only there, but also quickly giving you no need to use freelook toggle, as you have it readily available through TrackIR.
#45
Posted 09 March 2012 - 11:53 AM
#46
Posted 09 March 2012 - 04:18 PM
http://www.pcgamer.c...online-preview/
"...I’d just aim my arms, and maybe only have access to a few lasers rather than my full loadout. TrackIR support is also confirmed, thank goodness."
#47
Posted 12 March 2012 - 07:44 AM
Black Mamba, on 09 March 2012 - 04:18 PM, said:
http://www.pcgamer.c...online-preview/
"...I’d just aim my arms, and maybe only have access to a few lasers rather than my full loadout. TrackIR support is also confirmed, thank goodness."
Iiiiiinteresting.
Any PGI clarification, did PC Gamer hear you guys right?
#48
Posted 12 March 2012 - 09:51 AM
Disagree.
TrackIR would be awesome for controlling your torso direction. And would dramticly increase player Immersion into feeling part OF your Mech. I think I`d like to try that for sure. Hopefully it can be set to control your torso view sideways/up down etc etc etc. We can still aim independantly using the joystick.
Edited by shai`tan, 12 March 2012 - 09:51 AM.
#49
Posted 18 March 2012 - 01:08 AM
in study sims like DCS A10, you can still "mouse look" or joystick hat scroll around to get to switch panels, and people manage just fine, so it's not "essential" for all people to have..
However, once you have used trackir in a full 3d (clickable) cockpit, it is VERY difficult to go back....it is so very intuitive.
The major downside would be the developer overhead to make sure the Mech cockpit can be viewed correctly from any angle instead of from the limited FOV of most previous titles..
Not a big deal if Mech cockpits will be generic across all models...but a Major artwork overhead if each chassis has a unique cockpit.
Still, since I have a trackir, I definitely vote for the devs to support
#50
Posted 20 March 2012 - 05:34 PM
#51
Posted 21 March 2012 - 12:16 AM
#53
Posted 21 March 2012 - 05:01 AM
If they even support 6DOF TrackIR's you can lean forward in that Atlas cockpit to get a much wider view of the outside...
Still want to control the gunsight with the mouse though, and be able to disconnect mouse/arm movement from torso movement..
#54
Posted 21 March 2012 - 07:42 AM
the newest Track IR (version 5) is incredibly accurate; lightyears beyond any webcam head tracking software, and still leaps ahead of the previous model 4. I use it for X-Plane and it is extremely accurate. The settings are scaleable and on the more sensitive settings, a 2 to 3 degree shift in head movement translates to a smooth and predictable 30 degree perspective shift on screen. I have no doubt that with the pace of gameplay in any MechWarrior game, TrackiR 5 could be used to aim at least as well as a joystick.
#55
Posted 21 March 2012 - 09:06 AM
BTW, HMD on Apache provides only rough tracking for the M230. Fine aim is performing with the regular joystick on the weapons operator's station. Because of the same reason - low accuracy of the head tracking devices.
Edited by Scar, 21 March 2012 - 09:07 AM.
#56
Posted 21 March 2012 - 01:29 PM
First, you completely ignored my statement of Track iR 5's increased sensitivity. Track IR is extremely sensitive and capable of very fine tuned movements. I'm not exactly sure what, "How you planned to aim the torso weapons?" means, but I assume you are referring to the fact that the mouse would be controlling the arm weapons, while the torso weapons are direct center firing. to answer that question then: you turn your head for lateral movement and actuate the joystick's Y axis to aim torso weapons. Now this is a rough concept, but the point is, you could use head tracking hardware to further augment game play beyond freelook.
And yes, you could use a joystick, a mouse, a keyboard, and TrackIR. Would there be a learning curve? Sure, is it possible? Very much so. A pilot flying a small plane in IFR conditions not only manipulates the controls to manually fly the plane, but also navigates, monitors and interprets several instruments at once, communicates with ATC, and writes notes...And that's just enroute, the workload is tremendously higher while on approach to an airport.
BTW, I'd like you to cite where you get your information. I am a helicopter flight engineer and I've been around plenty of AH-64s and I'm very curious where this 'regular joystick' is located. I can tell you that fine aiming is NOT performed using a regular joystick, least of all because that would defeat the purpose of the IHADSS system. How do you propose this would work? The co-pilot looks at the target, then looks down at the screen to finely adjust using this magic joystick? Sure, except that in the process of looking down the system followed the head movement and now it's looking somewhere else.
Here's how it really works. A system of IR sensors in the cockpit track the movement of either pilot's helmet. Each pilot has a visor eye piece that projects a HUD, an integral part of that HUD is a cross-hair that tracks the actual position of the M230, or other weapons within their designated field of fire. In other words, if the pilot quickly turned his or her head to the left, as the weapon slewed to the left, a crosshair would appear on the right side of pilot's HUD, and then center. The Apache's threat designation systems use millimeter wave technology to acquire and identify targets, it can identify persons, vehicles, aircraft, or other mission specific items. Additionally, it can even prioritize the targets according to which one is currently the most threatening to the aircraft. When the crosshair falls onto one of these targets, the pilot presses a switch on his cyclic, or collective (Can't remember which) locking that target. At that point the weapons stop following the helmet movement, and a live feed or "gun cam" is displayed on one of the pilot's MFDs.
Edited by Zenner, 21 March 2012 - 01:33 PM.
#57
Posted 22 March 2012 - 02:57 AM
Zenner, on 21 March 2012 - 01:29 PM, said:
First, you completely ignored my statement of Track iR 5's increased sensitivity. Track IR is extremely sensitive and capable of very fine tuned movements.
TrackIR by itself - yes. But not TrackIR + your neck. In real life you're tracking the objects generally with your eyes, which are have stabilization and fast and precise small groups of muscles. Anatomically, your neck only provides the rough tracking of the sector of interest. We already discussed that in this thread and in the others about TrackIR.
Quote
Aim the torso weapons with two controllers, each of these is responsible for only one axis?! No way.
Quote
That's why some smart people designed a HOTAS concept for combat vehicles. The prize not worth the game you gonna play - too many difficulties, too low effeciency in result.
Quote
Before i told you how the CPG aim the M230 in those blasting guncam records on YouTube - answer to yourself one single question: what a chance to fine aim the M230 with IDHASS, sitting in flying helicopter, which is constantly vibrating, turning and rolling, and finally - producing a lot of shaking?
For the fine weapon aiming in such conditions Apache' co-pilot has a great device, called "mission grip" besides the ORT MFD, with the thumbhat "MAN TRK" on it. That's why in the videos from Apache' guncam you can see the TADS FOV moving most time discretely, like someone pressing the buttons on keyborad.
How it works step-by-step, according to the TM 1-1520-251-10 - Apache Operator's Manual.
1) Select the HMD as acquisition source
2) Push the SLAVE SWITCH button
2) Select TADS on the SIGHT SELECT SWITCH
3) Roughly place the HMD' crosshair to the sector of interest.
4) TADS LOS should following your head and HMD crosshair.
5) Once TADS LOS reached the sector of interest - push the LMC button on the RHG to keep the TADS LOS on the sector of interest.
6) Head down to the ORT
7) Push the SLAVE SWITCH button again
8) Start the fine-aim with the MAN TRK thumb-hat
9) <here is some random operations with the weapons>
10) Fire!
Quote
You didn't know about the "sight slaving", LMC, IAT and other stabilization modes on Apache?! RLY? You've made a very strange statement - for the Apache' flight engineer....
Quote
Didn't get what Longbow millimeter wave RADAR have to do with the the HMD aiming algorithm. Yes, it can be slaved to HMD - but not very useful in the most cases. And how are you going to identify persons with it? It's not a job for Longbow RADAR - because it can detect only radio-contrast targets. So, if you're not attacking the regiment of heavy knights in steel armor - the Longbow is useless, it's a job for the FLIR on the TADS station.
Edited by Scar, 22 March 2012 - 03:29 AM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users