Sarriss, on 05 October 2012 - 05:16 AM, said:
I understand if someone (man or woman) sees a car as merely a tool for transportation and cares only that it runs reliably and cheaply. That is sadly how newer generations are going, including mine. There is a very large % of people in my city who don't have a license simply because they never want to drive, at least that must be the reason because our public transit is horrible and cities far larger then ours have a much better infrastructure.
However it is ignorant to refer to manual transmission vehicles as "more convoluted method of transportation". You must be younger then me if you think that. Automatics have been around for a long while yes, but standards predate them by decades. Hell, the automobile has been invented for a hundred years and only now are automatics starting to finally get better fuel economy then standards, and it's still marginal at best. (not counting hybrids of course)
Just as ignorant as to assume you aren't a real man if you don't know how to drive a stick. You make it sound as if we choose to drive a stick because we know 1/5 of the people who ever sit in our car would ever be able to drive it in an emergency and that somehow makes us superior. That being said, I would boycott any vehicle that could drive itself and would never own one until it became law. I love to drive, and I do it safely, I'm not worried about me, it's every white knuckled, boy racer, drunk and reckless drivers that worry me.
No. You aren't a man if you don't know how to drive manual. Sorry.
However, yes... the punks racing their daddy's cars, and drinking and driving bring my blood to a boil. My ex-girlfriend was taken from me and her loved ones by a drunk driver. Look, I love booze, and I love racing, but when you drink... YOU MAKE THE ADULT RESPONSIBILITY TO NOT DRIVE. And when you race, DO IT ON A TRACK.
I'm sure you won't disagree with me on that, at least. lol