![](https://static.mwomercs.com/forums//public/style_images/master/icon_users.png)
![](https://static.mwomercs.com/img/house/lonewolf.png)
Power Down Question
#1
Posted 22 June 2012 - 02:29 AM
“Incoming Missiles; get out of there!”
“On it!”
He slams his throttle forward. Dodging into cover spotted previous, and slaps his power down. As his ’Mech hums itself to sleep, he listens to the dull ‘thud’ of exploding missiles above. Again slapping the power button, revving back up, and quickly moved into the open.
Does this mean that powering down causes incoming missiles to detonate when they lose their lock, or maybe I'm misinterpreting it? I think I read somewhere that the Dev's said they detonate at the limit of their range too.
As he got into cover, I wasn't sure if it meant that they were impacting on the terrain above him, but if this is the case why power down then restart immediately?
Thanks in advance for your thoughts on this guys
#2
Posted 22 June 2012 - 02:42 AM
#3
Posted 22 June 2012 - 02:51 AM
It could give a nice advantage against missile boats in certain situations if it is the case. Wait and see though, like you say.
#4
Posted 22 June 2012 - 03:31 AM
#5
Posted 22 June 2012 - 04:01 AM
Tbh I like where your question is going but I think you're reading too much game-mechanics into a bit of creative writing
#6
Posted 22 June 2012 - 04:30 AM
#7
Posted 22 June 2012 - 05:13 AM
Now....why would he do that?
Well cover protects him from the missiles, as evidenced by the missiles hitting the cover. Shutting down also ditches any locks that people have on him as he's now behind cover and shut down. Did the shut down also ditch the missiles lock? Hard to tell, he got shut down just before missile impact so...
But shutdown would have ditched any locks that people had on him, which is what he needed as he then ditched cover and was on the move again. Would have been bad for him if he hadn't as he might have stepped out of cover into another swarm of LRMs...which would have been bad.
#8
Posted 22 June 2012 - 05:50 AM
Plus by shutting down, the attack no longer has a target, encouraging them to move closer and with LRM if they move too close they cannot be fired. That is something made clear on a video.
So then you can switch her back on and run towards the enemy as fast as you can. Forcing them to fire lasers. That is important because ammo hurts especially from what I seen on the video.
#9
Posted 22 June 2012 - 06:09 AM
Powering down should make the missle tracking system lose its ability for auto correction thus making them continue in a straight line towards last known target position - usually hitting nothing and exploding after running out of fuel or hitting some hard cover/rock/wall etc.
I have no idea how was this dealt with canon wise, if anybody knows please do tell for this is an interesting topic.
#10
Posted 22 June 2012 - 06:14 AM
Gives you a tactical advantage to come flying back out of cover and take him while he is on another mechs case.
#11
Posted 22 June 2012 - 06:26 AM
#12
Posted 22 June 2012 - 06:52 AM
blindprophet, on 22 June 2012 - 05:13 AM, said:
Now....why would he do that?
Well cover protects him from the missiles, as evidenced by the missiles hitting the cover. Shutting down also ditches any locks that people have on him as he's now behind cover and shut down. Did the shut down also ditch the missiles lock? Hard to tell, he got shut down just before missile impact so...
But shutdown would have ditched any locks that people had on him, which is what he needed as he then ditched cover and was on the move again. Would have been bad for him if he hadn't as he might have stepped out of cover into another swarm of LRMs...which would have been bad.
I suppose it'd depend on how long it takes to re-establish lockon. You could go to cover, power down, break any existing locks, then dash to new cover before they could get a proper heading and avoid getting bombarded again. In areas with lots of buildings/cover, just shaking lock once might be enough to reduce your pain and suffering considerably.
Perhaps the devs are giving us clues on how we'll see other players, and what you can do to evade them...
#13
Posted 04 October 2012 - 01:44 AM
This is what I remember from long ago when I played MW3-4. I'm fairly sure these statements are accurate. And I would like to say I learned this in a mission or something?
I am also not sure if this applies is MW Online. I will check and verify this for you.
I'm not exactly sure, but I'm pretty sure your signature was caused by heat. Shutting off your mech with sufficient time to cool to 0 allowed you to have no heat signature, and therefor nothing to lock onto. When you break a lock, the missiles already sent out no longer have you listed as a target. Your past signature is pretty much considered a "dead" target. And any new missiles fired at you upon a new lock when you startup, will follow a new "live" signature. If that makes sense?
Essentially, your heat causes the signature to move. No heat. No signature. Once you lose that signature, you can freely reboot with a fresh one. :DDD However, try to shutdown under cover. Because being shutdown, turns off all your systems. You have no idea where enemies are, and if you are deep in a hostile zone, this could potentially be even worse.
Shutting down is a tactical function, that if used properly, can insure your survival.
#14
Posted 04 October 2012 - 01:55 AM
Edited by LanceHavenbay, 04 October 2012 - 01:57 AM.
#15
Posted 04 October 2012 - 02:02 AM
#16
Posted 04 October 2012 - 03:37 AM
#17
Posted 04 October 2012 - 06:24 AM
Powering down does work if done correctly. Break line of site, power down, power up, move keeping out of line of sight.
The last patch brought a different mechanic in that a mech that overheats now breaks locks when it shuts down, so Stormy may be locked onto a mech that shuts down due to overheating.
#18
Posted 04 October 2012 - 09:08 AM
One of the nice thing though: If you lose lock mid-flight, then reacquire it, the missiles will try to change direction in mid air to head for the target still.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users