10 replies to this topic

[KaoS Hazard]

From the looks of all these suggestions, it looks like everybody wants some sort of WoW/Eve-esque game.

Is this the case or will we be able to host a game, have teams, and just fight each other?

You have all these players that are going to the extreme about add-ons, like having bottles and garbage visible inside the mech. I would think many would agree with me that we want new/updated maps, updated graphics, and a good multiplayer lobby.

I want to build my mech and fight with my friends. I do not want to play the ******* child of WoW/Eve and Mechwarrior.

[Elucid Ward]

KaoS_Hazard, on 02 November 2011 - 02:56 PM, said:

From the looks of all these suggestions, it looks like everybody wants some sort of WoW/Eve-esque game.

Is this the case or will we be able to host a game, have teams, and just fight each other?

You have all these players that are going to the extreme about add-ons, like having bottles and garbage visible inside the mech. I would think many would agree with me that we want new/updated maps, updated graphics, and a good multiplayer lobby.

I want to build my mech and fight with my friends. I do not want to play the ******* child of WoW/Eve and Mechwarrior.

I don't want WOW. I certainly don't want EVE. And I dare say, I speak for a lot of other people when I say, no one here wants that.

[KaoS Hazard]

Well it seems like there are two groups on here

1: FFP, Heat, limited ammo, and no customization/stock (other than paint, emblems, random ****)
1a:FFP, Heat, limited ammo, customization

2: 3rd, No Heat, Unlimited ammo, and full customization
2a: 3rd, Heat, limited ammo, and full customization

Both of these are possible through server settings yet we have group 1 wants to force its settings onto everyone else. Since the developers said we won't have PVE, why can't we have it both ways? FFP players can play together, while 3rd person can play together. This system worked perfectly fine in MW4.

Edited by KaoS_Hazard, 02 November 2011 - 03:17 PM.

[Liam]

KaoS_Hazard, on 02 November 2011 - 03:09 PM, said:

1: FFP, Heat, limited ammo, and no customization (other than paint, emblems, random ****)

2: 3rd, No Heat, Unlimited ammo, and full customization

I think you fogot 3d group:

FFP, Heat, limited ammo, customization

[Elucid Ward]

I'm in group three. I want:

FFP, Heat, Limited Ammo, Full Customisation.

[KaoS Hazard]

Liam, on 02 November 2011 - 03:13 PM, said:

I think you fogot 3d group:

FFP, Heat, limited ammo, customization

My mistake, made some changes.

[KaoS Hazard]

Elucid Ward, on 02 November 2011 - 03:17 PM, said:

I'm in group three. I want:

FFP, Heat, Limited Ammo, Full Customisation.

I think that these should be server side settings

FFP or 1st/3rd optional

H/ NH

LA/UA

[Elucid Ward]

I think it should be neither. Consistency is the key to creating a good product - No Heat, Unilimited Ammo create poor players, and segregates the community.

[KaoS Hazard]

Elucid Ward, on 02 November 2011 - 03:21 PM, said:

I think it should be neither. Consistency is the key to creating a good product - No Heat, Unilimited Ammo create poor players, and segregates the community.

Why did the MW4 games (veng/merc) hold on so much longer compared to the other MW games?

[AgonyColumn]

Yes, I agree.. I hope we are able to host a room and have a clan v clan match. Many of the games out there these days have overlooked this. And it goes a long way towards clan activity. Witch is in the end what they want right?... clan activity.

[Aeolian]

KaoS_Hazard, on 02 November 2011 - 03:26 PM, said:

Why did the MW4 games (veng/merc) hold on so much longer compared to the other MW games?

Because they were the last ones.