Frankly, I have no idea, I've been going by the wikipedia entry which makes it sound as if Catalyst has purchased limited rights from Topps, who is currently the overall holder of the license ever since they've swallowed WizKids.
http://en.wikipedia....iki/Topps#Games
As for the second point, I did address that with the rest of the sentence, where I mentioned that - in theory - the license holder could make an example of the customer. They could not, however, sue the printer, so they'd have to rely on the effect this would have on other potential customers, which will have to be balanced with the negative PR that comes with such an action.
And the beancounters and lawyers that care for such breaches of license are unlikely to read this forum. In my personal experience, front line contacts (such as moderators) are usually themselves fans of the franchise they represent and thus are thus somewhat more likely to side with the customer (or at least not care about it) rather than embodying the corporate spirit of absolute trademark protection, especially since their own situation will not be affected either way. This is way too small in scale to hurt the business, especially since these products are not even in competition with the license holder, who quite simply does not offer this kind of merchandise yet.
Of course, this thread could still get locked. I just doubt it will have any sort of consequences whatsoever.
Edited by Kyone Akashi, 07 June 2012 - 05:19 AM.