3 replies to this topic

[bollemrk]

The say the test with several standard build's

What are these's "standard" build's if the are oke with 1.4 dhs

My wood bee Op with 2.0 but get bad with 1.4

1.6 /1.75 is goed in my number's
with a max of 15.0 in the engine so making those 10 1.5
(1.5 m cb fore 5 hs)


but perhaps my build's are insane i woud like to compare then to the def's one's

Edited by bollemrk, 05 November 2012 - 05:45 AM.

[MaddMaxx]

Stock Builds. Or Trial configs perhaps.

[bollemrk]

MaddMaxx, on 05 November 2012 - 09:05 AM, said:

Stock Builds. Or Trial configs perhaps.

i hope not
thoze are heat and ammo ballans bad bad bad bad !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Edited by bollemrk, 05 November 2012 - 02:01 PM.

[sgt kiesel]

Yes too I would like to know what builds PGI is using for their internal testing...

I personally find any build with a heat efficiency even close to 1.0 completely unusable. Preferring 1.5, with 1.3 being the lower margin for tolerable. And even then you have to break and run from sustained combat.

And let's not get into the travesty that has been done to the canon builds. Most of them were sub-optimal even before being saddled with not enough ammo to deal with double armor, and not enough HS to deal with triple ROF.