People Complaining About Lrm,streaks,lasers,ac Unbalanced
#1
Posted 06 November 2012 - 09:43 AM
#2
Posted 06 November 2012 - 09:43 AM
#3
Posted 06 November 2012 - 09:49 AM
I am a pretty good pilot. I can run just about any mech well (not great but well). I can fight in LRM's, in Streaks, in laser mechs, in combined arms mechs, short range, long range, scouting, etc.
And I think some balance issue are outstanding in the game.
I think PPC's are below par.
I think ERLL are below par (in spite of the fact that one of my favorite builds right now is the 2 ERLL/1 LL Ctatpult)
etc
None of these is a huge deal. But changes SHOULD be made for balance.
#4
Posted 06 November 2012 - 09:51 AM
Do I think people could be a bit more constructive with their "Criticism" yes but I think that's asking to much sometimes.
Edited by Dagnome, 06 November 2012 - 09:51 AM.
#5
Posted 06 November 2012 - 09:59 AM
I also think streaks, LRMs and Gauss are noob weapons. They are. They're far to effective and "easy" to kill things with.
However, Koreanese, if you disagree and still think I'm not good at the game--I call you out right now to a duel (pending the addition of the feature that allows this). I challenge you to 1on1 combat with the following restrictions:
C1 weapons (energy), Autocannons and SRMs only. No LRMs, no Guass, no Streaks.
Lets do it. I will enjoy our fight. May it be honorable when the developers permit such a contest of wits.
#6
Posted 06 November 2012 - 10:18 AM
Mister Blastman, on 06 November 2012 - 09:59 AM, said:
However, Koreanese, if you disagree and still think I'm not good at the game--I call you out right now to a duel (pending the addition of the feature that allows this). I challenge you to 1on1 combat with the following restrictions:
C1 weapons (energy), Autocannons and SRMs only. No LRMs, no Guass, no Streaks.
Lets do it. I will enjoy our fight. May it be honorable when the developers permit such a contest of wits.
If you're good at the game, why do you want to restrict the weapon choices for your duel? Shouldn't the point be for you to use the supposedly OP weapons to defeat him, and he uses the non-OP weapons to defeat you?
#7
Posted 06 November 2012 - 10:21 AM
So if I understand this right, the OP is willing to face my Dragon with a Dragon/Catapult armed with only PPCs and AC10s?
#8
Posted 06 November 2012 - 10:22 AM
Comassion, on 06 November 2012 - 10:18 AM, said:
If you're good at the game, why do you want to restrict the weapon choices for your duel? Shouldn't the point be for you to use the supposedly OP weapons to defeat him, and he uses the non-OP weapons to defeat you?
The quesiton here is whether those weapons are not balanced. So the obvious answer is to eliminate them from the choices. It is up to Koreanese to prove his argument that weapons balancing is not needed, not the other way around.
If Koreanese is as good as he implies, he should be able to win with any weapon.
#9
Posted 06 November 2012 - 10:46 AM
Sprouticus, on 06 November 2012 - 10:22 AM, said:
The quesiton here is whether those weapons are not balanced. So the obvious answer is to eliminate them from the choices. It is up to Koreanese to prove his argument that weapons balancing is not needed, not the other way around.
If Koreanese is as good as he implies, he should be able to win with any weapon.
A better challenge would be best of three. One where you both use the weapons you mentioned, another where you both use the suggested OP weapons, and a third match where each participant used their weapons of choice.
#10
Posted 06 November 2012 - 03:09 PM
Since when did become a challenge fest to see whos got the bigger gun in the pants?
Edited by Koreanese, 06 November 2012 - 03:10 PM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users















