1 reply to this topic

[ThePieMaker]

So to give some perspective....the Dragon has a max of 56 armor per side torso(to be split between front and back). The Catapult has 60 per side torso to split between front and back. There are 5 tons between the Dragon and Catapult right? There are 5 tons between the Catapult and Cataphract right? So shouldn't the Cataphract have a max of 64 armor to split between front and back per side torso? Well it only has 60(same as catapult). I know its not a whole bunch of armor but it could make a difference. It would make the Cataphract seem a bit more beefy when compared to the Catapult. Also the side torso's on the Cataphract are much easier to hit than those on the Catapult so they kind of need to be stronger.
I'm not an XL whiner, that begs for huge amounts of side torso strength, just throwing this out there.
-ThePieMaker

[Kibble]

I would think since it's more balancing and if I remember correctly it has the same armor values as TT. You are trading off the armor for the amount of weapons you can hold and the fact that you can house a much faster engine on the Cataphract than you can with the Dragon and the Catapult.

Let's be honest. The phract is a beast with the load outs you can put on there.