Jump to content

Lrm Are...


16 replies to this topic

#1 Duncan Morales

    Member

  • PipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 44 posts
  • LocationNew Eden; Firefall +1

Posted 07 November 2012 - 04:37 AM

ruinning this game...

VOTE -> http://mwomercs.com/...69976-lrm-poll/


Please don´t understand me wrong, LRM´s are a nice weapon and they are a main part of the battletech weapons collection but they are to strong now....

http://gobarbra.com/...0ad0e828cd5a1aa


maybe you have tested DHS and nerfed it but you definetly not tested LRM´s and even not tested with artemis...

#2 QuantumButler

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 4,534 posts
  • LocationTaiwan, One True China

Posted 07 November 2012 - 04:39 AM

If they keep current lrm trajectories, lrm damage needs to go back down to 1.5 per rocket, if they keep current damage, they need to spread out more and have trajectories more easily blocked by terrrain [like last patch]

#3 CrazyCatDaddy

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 326 posts

Posted 07 November 2012 - 04:39 AM

They need a buff! Please edit your poll so we can vote for that.

They got nerfed this patch into oblivion.

#4 QuantumButler

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 4,534 posts
  • LocationTaiwan, One True China

Posted 07 November 2012 - 04:39 AM

View Postngl, on 07 November 2012 - 04:39 AM, said:

They need a buff! Please edit your poll so we can vote for that.

They got nerfed this patch into oblivion.


0/10

#5 Relic1701

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,197 posts
  • LocationDying at the end of your cheese build!

Posted 07 November 2012 - 04:43 AM

Where's the 'I understand that there are balancing issues that need to be addressed, and new equipment that needs to be implemented' choice?

#6 CrazyCatDaddy

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 326 posts

Posted 07 November 2012 - 04:43 AM

View PostQuantumButler, on 07 November 2012 - 04:39 AM, said:

0/10


Jah manipulate your votes so people have to vote your way. If you edit in a wish for a buff you would see that the majority of the community agrees with me.

#7 QuantumButler

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 4,534 posts
  • LocationTaiwan, One True China

Posted 07 November 2012 - 04:43 AM

View Postngl, on 07 November 2012 - 04:43 AM, said:


Jah manipulate your votes so people have to vote your way. If you edit in a wish for a buff you would see that the majority of the community agrees with me.


Jah jah unt I am made of butter.

Edited by QuantumButler, 07 November 2012 - 04:44 AM.


#8 Belorion

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 5,469 posts
  • LocationEast Coast

Posted 07 November 2012 - 04:46 AM

Actually they did get nerfed. They lose lock faster when you duck behind cover

#9 ciller

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Liquid Metal
  • Liquid Metal
  • 486 posts
  • LocationEdmonton

Posted 07 November 2012 - 04:48 AM

They need to add ECM, not nerf LRMs

#10 CrazyCatDaddy

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 326 posts

Posted 07 November 2012 - 04:49 AM

View PostBelorion, on 07 November 2012 - 04:46 AM, said:

Actually they did get nerfed. They lose lock faster when you duck behind cover


Yep and they do a lot less damage. This would be so easy if people would just read the patch notes.

#11 QuantumButler

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 4,534 posts
  • LocationTaiwan, One True China

Posted 07 November 2012 - 04:55 AM

View Postngl, on 07 November 2012 - 04:49 AM, said:


Yep and they do a lot less damage. This would be so easy if people would just read the patch notes.


Uh, no they didn't get reduced damage.

Show me in the patchnotes where it says they did, I just read them twice and did not see any mention of reduced LRM damage.

#12 Joseph Mallan

    ForumWarrior

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • 35,216 posts
  • Google+: Link
  • Facebook: Link
  • LocationMallanhold, Furillo

Posted 07 November 2012 - 04:58 AM

View Postngl, on 07 November 2012 - 04:43 AM, said:


Jah manipulate your votes so people have to vote your way. If you edit in a wish for a buff you would see that the majority of the community agrees with me.

As a Missile Boat Captain I don't agree with you Sir. Our Missiles are taking the sport out of killing people. I want a challenge. I don't have it any more.

#13 John Norad

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Knight Errant
  • Knight Errant
  • 524 posts

Posted 07 November 2012 - 05:07 AM

View PostRelic1701, on 07 November 2012 - 04:43 AM, said:

Where's the 'I understand that there are balancing issues that need to be addressed, and new equipment that needs to be implemented' choice?

More importantly, where is the "Guys, it's still BETA, cut them some slack! L2P, if you don't like it, uninstall" option?

Sorry for borderline trolling, but I'd still like to know why this issue seems so much different from other issues. Makes me question overall tester objectivity, as it smells of double standards.

Just for the record, I also think LRMs are too strong atm. But I don't think they should be balanced with ECM. ECM should be an option, not a necessity.

Edited by John Norad, 07 November 2012 - 05:12 AM.


#14 Mongoose Trueborn

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Veteran Founder
  • Veteran Founder
  • 742 posts

Posted 07 November 2012 - 05:11 AM

Oh noes!!! They buffed the iWin noob missile too much now the skilled players are dominating with them.

Epic....I will continue to contribute to these post by feasting on the tears of the OPs. I'm on the EU ts3 server if you want to join in the fun.

#15 BeezleBug

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 125 posts

Posted 07 November 2012 - 05:11 AM

View Postngl, on 07 November 2012 - 04:49 AM, said:


Yep and they do a lot less damage. This would be so easy if people would just read the patch notes.


No they dont!! read the patch notes again!...LRM do as allways double dmg, totaly bull...
the only weapon that ignore the double armor...nerf them, would be better 4 the game.
no double heatsink but lrm push?! that makes no sense.

#16 Pop Weeasel

    Member

  • Pip
  • Stone Cold
  • Stone Cold
  • 12 posts

Posted 07 November 2012 - 12:11 PM

View Postngl, on 07 November 2012 - 04:39 AM, said:

They need a buff! Please edit your poll so we can vote for that.

They got nerfed this patch into oblivion.

View Postngl, on 07 November 2012 - 04:43 AM, said:


Jah manipulate your votes so people have to vote your way. If you edit in a wish for a buff you would see that the majority of the community agrees with me.



L2R

this is not his poll
its mine

but its fine how your are blaming youre self by showing howclever you are

*facepalm*

#17 Garth Erlam

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,756 posts
  • Facebook: Link
  • YouTube: Link
  • LocationVancouver, BC

Posted 07 November 2012 - 12:43 PM

This is a known bug, we're working on it. Thank you everyone ;)





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users