Jump to content

Dear Pgi: On Ssrms From A Scout

v1.0.142

3 replies to this topic

#1 Stimraug

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • CS 2023 Gold Champ
  • CS 2023 Gold Champ
  • 95 posts

Posted 14 November 2012 - 09:30 AM

Hello,

I'd like to give feedback about the current tracking ability of the Streak SRM, specifically the SSRM2. As a light mech player, (mostly Jenner at the moment) I use streaks all the time.

What bothers me is that one or two missiles often miss when firing locked SSRM2s even at a big target (atlas) at 40-50 meters. In other words, 50-100% of the damage from my two precious *homing* missiles are wasted at 40-60 meters quite often. This is a clear sign of too much spread on streaks.

Suggestion: Please tighten the grouping on SSRMs, atleast SSRM2.

Thanks.

#2 Mongoose Trueborn

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Veteran Founder
  • Veteran Founder
  • 742 posts

Posted 14 November 2012 - 09:34 AM

You don't run a light or you wouldn't have made this post. SSRMs own lights.

#3 Name60014

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 195 posts
  • LocationStamford, CT

Posted 14 November 2012 - 09:39 AM

No, they don't own lights. They hit lights but they don't own us. As a light pilot I think its stupid that SSRMs now miss without actually having to do any efficient piloting on the part of the target. I've heard OMG STREAKCAT on TS often enough but I don't care. They've killed me before if I've been dumb. There's no reason to nerf them.

I've seen streaks miss stationary targets. That's beyond unbalanced. That's broken. They should hit all the time unless you're using terrain or speed. And yes, I pilot a JR7-F most of the time so I don't even use them most drops

#4 Stimraug

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • CS 2023 Gold Champ
  • CS 2023 Gold Champ
  • 95 posts

Posted 14 November 2012 - 01:14 PM

View PostMongoose Trueborn, on 14 November 2012 - 09:34 AM, said:

You don't run a light or you wouldn't have made this post. SSRMs own lights.


I do run lights actually.

Posted Image





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users