data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3ae9/b3ae9cf8cfed3e06df6984fcf2a08c460eab065d" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8e59c/8e59c8eb831d5152589c66f755c56e3f275049fc" alt=""
#3421
Posted 20 November 2012 - 08:38 AM
#3422
Posted 20 November 2012 - 08:39 AM
Lokust Davion, on 20 November 2012 - 08:34 AM, said:
Wouldn't surprise me if it did and if it was an actual pilot module that you have to use GXP on, in practice destroying their excuse of enhancing the new player experience by putting it behind a pay/grindwall. Oh lawd the irony!
20,000 GXP and 5 million c-bills for 3rd person raff raff
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/875f5/875f55d7cfd0f91d66acfbdc57a4650835170544" alt=":)"
#3423
Posted 20 November 2012 - 08:42 AM
Also, it really sucks to see Piranha not giving a **** about promises. I wonder when we get gold ammo.
#3424
Posted 20 November 2012 - 08:46 AM
#3425
Posted 20 November 2012 - 08:48 AM
#3426
Posted 20 November 2012 - 08:50 AM
Fugu, on 20 November 2012 - 08:42 AM, said:
Also, it really sucks to see Piranha not giving a **** about promises. I wonder when we get gold ammo.
this game is unlikely to have gold ammo, but it will have gold mechs.
edit: err... actually it already does.
Rest assured t.u.r.d person will come. MWO is inspired by WOT and it is slowly evolving into WOM.
Edited by Lokust Davion, 20 November 2012 - 08:55 AM.
#3427
Posted 20 November 2012 - 08:51 AM
#3428
Posted 20 November 2012 - 08:54 AM
Fugu, on 20 November 2012 - 08:42 AM, said:
Also, it really sucks to see Piranha not giving a **** about promises. I wonder when we get gold ammo.
Lokust Davion, on 20 November 2012 - 08:50 AM, said:
this game is unlikely to have gold ammo, but it will have gold mechs.
Wait until clan tech roll's around. The same people saying "OMG The dev's already said no way in hell would clan tech be MC only!" are the same people in this thread quoting what Paul said about 3rd person never being implemented. Oh the irony.
#3429
Posted 20 November 2012 - 08:54 AM
#3430
Posted 20 November 2012 - 08:58 AM
Fetladral, on 20 November 2012 - 08:54 AM, said:
It's too bad IGP never said that.
#3431
Posted 20 November 2012 - 01:26 PM
#3432
Posted 20 November 2012 - 01:28 PM
http://mwomercs.com/...0-into-the-lab/
Quote
Holy kerfuffle Batman…
Third Person is being reviewed internally as an optional gameplay mode. No final decisions or designs have been made yet, however preliminary thoughts include:
- Players would be able to choose 1st or 3rd person or toggle between both.
- Players would be able to select how they are matched against other players: Only 1st person, Only 3rd person, or Mixed. This will preserve the integrity of matches and allow players maximum control over their gaming experience.
- The concern with a matchmaking solution is player base fragmentation, part of the reason why 3rd person isn’t being rushed to production.
- 3rd person would not change how LOS or targeting work.
- Players may gain a visual tactical advantage, depending on how much freedom in camera movement is given. This is subject to designing a camera system that feels good.
- The game isn’t easier per se in 3rd person, so we do not feel changing the meta rewards is necessary.
- For new users, 3rd person could be default or there will be a prompt for new players to select their view point.
- New players will benefit from seeing how torso twist and throttle work from the outside. This reduces new user friction and gets them into the game faster, with less frustration.
- This feature is designed to maximize player choice, by letting people select which mode they prefer.
Please sign here:
How To Reduce The Grind And Create A Great New User Experience
#3433
Posted 20 November 2012 - 01:36 PM
#3434
Posted 20 November 2012 - 01:42 PM
#3435
Posted 20 November 2012 - 01:57 PM
Taryys, on 20 November 2012 - 01:28 PM, said:
http://mwomercs.com/...0-into-the-lab/
Please sign here:
How To Reduce The Grind And Create A Great New User Experience
Bryan just doesn't get it...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/05986/05986a2b573e0db442ff0b0792c9425a6e480ebc" alt=":("
#3436
Posted 20 November 2012 - 02:01 PM
#3437
Posted 20 November 2012 - 02:05 PM
This isn't about the new player experience anymore, this is simply PGI wanting to make more money at any cost. The irony is it will probably never work.
#3438
Posted 20 November 2012 - 02:10 PM
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/05986/05986a2b573e0db442ff0b0792c9425a6e480ebc" alt=":("
I cant see anything positive (long term) out of adding 3rd person. It may just make some newbs happy to begin with, whilst ******* the rest of us off big time.
3rd person camera by default.....you have got to be kidding !!
#3439
Posted 20 November 2012 - 02:13 PM
Windies, on 20 November 2012 - 02:05 PM, said:
This isn't about the new player experience anymore, this is simply PGI wanting to make more money at any cost. The irony is it will probably never work.
My guess is because they only made XBOX games before, if they fail at this pc project they will port this directly to XBOX.
No need for DX11, No need for matchmaker, big need for 3rd view, back to what they do best, and fully funded by from a bunch of dumb BT MW mugs who threw cash on for their pc dream to happen.
Some people lap up everything they are fed from PGI IGP and defend everything viciously, they have every right to. But I don't think this will work either. A year later, with this, not at this rate.
3 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users