17 replies to this topic

[MetaMaxy]

If you're gonna dumb this game down to the point where a 3 year old can play it...? If so I'll just stop playing now...Seriously 3rd person view? Guess you should add a motion tracking radar and every weapon should be heat seeking or lock on.

I want this game to be good and I want it to still be a challenging and fun exerience...Ya know like games are suppose to be. Not another watered down pretty looking husk that looks good from the outside but once you get into it...It's just an empty boring shell.

Please stop giving in to the crying player base. PLEASE I beg you...Too many companies do this and ruin good games that way. Listen to the old BT/MW fans not the CoD guys that are all about pretty graphics and getting everything without any skill nor effort. I think I speak for most of the players on this game when I say...Don't dumb the game down for those who want everything for nothing and no effort.

[Leetskeet]

I for one sure wish every weapon was lock on.

That way everything would always hit server-side instead of having to make guesses at the air in front of the target

[Vassago Rain]

We need tumble features for the commandos, and some kind of QTEs when you touch another mech of the same tonnage, so you can bump them away. Can't let it get too personal, you know.

Maybe we should add regenerating armor, and force all mechs to 'focus' by holding up their arms, or their gunfire will go all over the place whenever you shoot? I think that's a fair direction to take this title. Much more immerse. Then, for each cockpit decoration you own, there'll be a corresponding mech bling piece. So if you buy the golden chalice, your atlas will now be holding an actual golden chalice, too. That way, you won't miss out by using the new and improved 3rd person view.

Don't forget, MC only clan mechs.

[MetaMaxy]

Bring in the things that are needed of corse. FPS rate fix and bring back knock downs. But don't make this game Mechassault...

[Darth JarJar]

MightyMaxyPad, on 17 November 2012 - 05:07 AM, said:

I think I speak for most of the players on this game when I say...Don't dumb the game down for those who want everything for nothing and no effort.

If you were paying attention to the last US election, you would know that this is the prevalent attitude now

[Chemie]

let's put in ammo drops and health drops like in mechassault. Then you would never die.

[Vassago Rain]

Chemie, on 17 November 2012 - 05:23 AM, said:

let's put in ammo drops and health drops like in mechassault. Then you would never die.

It's not enough. Some would obviously be confused by needing to interact with the environment. Better to allow everybody to carry 360 AC20 rounds right away, and if they withdraw for a few seconds, their armor will naturally regenerate itself.

[MrPenguin]

Hmm, a feature thats been in the series since the second game.
Please. do go on and tell me how having it some how dumbs this game down.

I can perfectly understand how having 3rd vs 1st person would give the 3rd person guy an advantage.
But... thats implying that they would pair them together. Did it ever occur to anyone on this forum that they would seperate people who use 3rd and 1st person? As in, only 1st person players will be paired against and with first person players ect..
Actually, thats exactly what they implied. Yet somehow... they're betraying the series and dumbing it down by removing a feature thats been a part of the series for 17 years?






...what?

[Vassago Rain]

MrPenguin, on 17 November 2012 - 05:33 AM, said:

Hmm, a feature thats been in the series since the second game.
Please. do go on and tell me how having it some how dumbs this game down.

I can perfectly understand how having 3rd vs 1st person would give the 3rd person guy an advantage.
But... thats implying that they would pair them together. Did it ever occur to anyone on this forum that they would seperate people who use 3rd and 1st person? As in, only 1st person players will be paired against and with first person players ect..
Actually, thats exactly what they implied. Yet somehow... they're betraying the series and dumbing it down by removing a feature thats been a part of the series for 17 years?






...what?

Ever heard of pop-tarting?

[MrPenguin]

Vassago Rain, on 17 November 2012 - 05:35 AM, said:

Ever heard of pop-tarting?

*looks it up on urbandictionary*

[Adridos]

MrPenguin, on 17 November 2012 - 05:37 AM, said:

*looks it up on urbandictionary*

What is there to say.

Guass+JJ+3rd person view = a deadly combination

[Vassago Rain]

MrPenguin, on 17 November 2012 - 05:37 AM, said:

*looks it up on urbandictionary*

You put jets on the mech.
Then you sit behind a hill, because you can 'see' over it at your liesure. Now you wait for someone to get in range, at which point, you jet up into the air for a fraction of a second, and unleash all your large lasers/gauss rifles.

Then you safely drop back in behind cover again.

That's all of MW3 and MW4's multiplayer, by the way. All of it.
This game's gonna be just like that.

[Lonestar1771]

Pretty sure they already did......

[Ghosth]

I just don't understand why they would open that can of worms and all it leads to.

[Lonestar1771]

Ghosth, on 17 November 2012 - 06:25 AM, said:

I just don't understand why they would open that can of worms and all it leads to.

Just one more of many bad decisions

[Hawks]

Oh no no no no no no no no no no no no no no. Please, just no. Worst idea ever.

This game needs third-person like it needs ammo crates and recharging health.

[Procobator]

I think there is a way to implement 3rd person view as not to get the "pop-tart" effect. If you don't let the player see the mech until there is a mech line of sight it would help curtail this. It would be a little strange though to see a mech just suddenly appear when in 3rd person view.

[Vassago Rain]

Why would you have terrible 3rd person view, or a terrible version of any feature, for that matter?

Leave it the **** out of here instead. Shooters don't work in 3rd person. We know this already.