Jump to content

Wtf


13 replies to this topic

#1 RitzBitz

    Member

  • Pip
  • 15 posts

Posted 20 November 2012 - 11:54 PM

No 8 man teams still?!?!?!? this is bullcrap. I want my money back!!!

#2 MadcatX

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Big Brother
  • Big Brother
  • 1,026 posts

Posted 20 November 2012 - 11:56 PM

I'm sure someone will be able to refund you in general discussion. Wouldn't hold my breath though.

#3 jakucha

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Knight Errant
  • 2,413 posts

Posted 20 November 2012 - 11:57 PM

View PostRitzBitz, on 20 November 2012 - 11:54 PM, said:

No 8 man teams still?!?!?!? this is bullcrap. I want my money back!!!



Show me where they said it would be released on this very day, with this very patch. Oh wait, you can't.

#4 Johnny Reb

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 3,945 posts
  • LocationColumbus, Ohio. However, I hate the Suckeyes!

Posted 20 November 2012 - 11:59 PM

Why should they give any refunds cause your a ***** and I want my bill back? After every patch we get this garbage!

Edited by Johnny Reb, 21 November 2012 - 12:01 AM.


#5 Xelrah

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 268 posts
  • LocationPoland

Posted 20 November 2012 - 11:59 PM

View Postjakucha, on 20 November 2012 - 11:57 PM, said:



Show me where they said it would be released on this very day, with this very patch. Oh wait, you can't.


It was stated in http://mwomercs.com/...79-matchmaking/ before but they changed it after the patch to 4th.

#6 Alexa Steel

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Knight Errant
  • Knight Errant
  • 505 posts
  • LocationSirius VI-A, Free Worlds League

Posted 21 November 2012 - 12:03 AM

View PostXelrah, on 20 November 2012 - 11:59 PM, said:


It was stated in http://mwomercs.com/...79-matchmaking/ before but they changed it after the patch to 4th.

...well there is the answer, it got delayed, so?

#7 Streeter

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 447 posts
  • LocationJapan

Posted 21 November 2012 - 12:05 AM

View PostAlexa Steel, on 21 November 2012 - 12:03 AM, said:

...well there is the answer, it got delayed, so?


more pug lovin!

#8 Alexa Steel

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Knight Errant
  • Knight Errant
  • 505 posts
  • LocationSirius VI-A, Free Worlds League

Posted 21 November 2012 - 12:06 AM

View PostStreeter, on 21 November 2012 - 12:05 AM, said:


more pug lovin!

Yay! No dont touch me there!

#9 RitzBitz

    Member

  • Pip
  • 15 posts

Posted 21 November 2012 - 12:07 AM

this is so lame. playing with pugers is a waste of time. by the time this game is worth playing, premium account will be up.I just can't begin to understand a game that would limit teamplay to such a degree. it's egregious.

#10 jakucha

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Knight Errant
  • 2,413 posts

Posted 21 November 2012 - 12:08 AM

View PostStreeter, on 21 November 2012 - 12:05 AM, said:


more pug lovin!


Exactly, you have nothing useful to add to this "discussion".

Anyway, I'd rather they release the matchmaking changes with it working instead of releasing it and having to add a bunch of hotfixes after.

Edited by jakucha, 21 November 2012 - 12:11 AM.


#11 Alexa Steel

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Knight Errant
  • Knight Errant
  • 505 posts
  • LocationSirius VI-A, Free Worlds League

Posted 21 November 2012 - 12:16 AM

View Postjakucha, on 21 November 2012 - 12:08 AM, said:


Exactly, you have nothing useful to add to this "discussion".

Anyway, I'd rather they release the matchmaking changes with it working instead of releasing it and having to add a bunch of hotfixes after.

Sir delays happen. I understand your frustration, but its not done yet.

#12 Streeter

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 447 posts
  • LocationJapan

Posted 21 November 2012 - 12:19 AM

View Postjakucha, on 21 November 2012 - 12:08 AM, said:


Exactly, you have nothing useful to add to this "discussion".

Anyway, I'd rather they release the matchmaking changes with it working instead of releasing it and having to add a bunch of hotfixes after.



hey no need to get snippy. was just saying we need to suck it up. As frustrating as it is, if its not ready its not ready.

DEAL WITH IT.

#13 MoonUnitBeta

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Philanthropist
  • Philanthropist
  • 4,560 posts
  • LocationCanada ᕙ(⇀‸↼‶)ᕗ

Posted 21 November 2012 - 12:21 AM

I really am sitting in my chair reading general discussion and thinking "man... I hope they don't listen to 99% of this junk."

Everyone's looking for a place to fit in, and more people just hop on the bandwagon just to be part of a movement.
I don't know how many threads claim PGI promised this and that. Lol, give me a break... I thought people had a little more understanding and respect, but I guess this is what happens on the internet.

I say moderation should take a step up and anything that's not contributing to any real discussion should be faced with a 1 day temp ban for causing un-rest within the community. It's exactly what's happening, just no one's getting reprimanded for it, so why should they care what they type?

Edited by MoonUnitBeta, 21 November 2012 - 12:22 AM.


#14 Streeter

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 447 posts
  • LocationJapan

Posted 21 November 2012 - 12:23 AM

View PostMoonUnitBeta, on 21 November 2012 - 12:21 AM, said:

I really am sitting in my chair reading general discussion and thinking "man... I hope they don't listen to 99% of this junk."

Everyone's looking for a place to fit in, and more people just hop on the bandwagon just to be part of a movement.
I don't know how many threads claim PGI promised this and that. Lol, give me a break... I thought people had a little more understanding and respect, but I guess this is what happens on the internet.

I say moderation should take a step up and anything that's not contributing to any real discussion should be faced with a 1 day temp ban for causing un-rest within the community. It's exactly what's happening, just no one's getting reprimanded for it, so why should they care what they type?



does that ban include overly sensitive people derailing the thread topic aswell?





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users