wwiiogre, on 04 May 2012 - 05:34 PM, said:
Bullwerk,
Well thought out, well said other than your inference that this misunderstanding was caused by interaction. Which is only partly right, but mostly wrong.
[PAUL] Merc Corp names are registered names. Once it’s taken, it’s gone. As for canon protected faction/unit names, we will be locking out SOME of the key players in the BT timeline. (note I capitalized some)
Some has a different definition than ALL.
Excuse me for understanding the definitions of these two simple words (some as opposed to all) and how they are used, then using the definitions of two simple words combined with implied consent of PGI's actions here on the forum that led us to believe something that was later changed.
*SNIP*
So if PGI goes faction for NWH we are ok with that. But that is not said what is going to happen it has been merely hinted at with no explanations. We really as a unit want to work together. That will not change, none of us are taking our ball and going home. All of us want this to succeed. We just are quite frankly in shock of the exclusive nature of this decision.
Chris
Ogre,
First off I feel this is a conversation better held somewhere else but, it is being held where it is. This topic has infected a large number of posts and probably will do for days/weeks/months to come.
I will give you that Paul did say that but, Paul is not the final word. It has been stated that they were looking at the issue of using canon names and would come to a decision on it. In addition, even with Paul's words, it is no stretch to imagine that your unit name would be one of those that would be likely withheld. The same goes for GDL, CSJ and many others as people that want to affiliate tend to affiliate with the best known.
Moving on though, you state that your intent was never to control a known unit, I get that. You had no intention of claiming that what you did was all the NWH did BUT, everything you did would be something the NWH did. This is where the issue comes in, by being associated with and carrying the NWH name you become representative of that unit and your actions reflect upon it. If they allowed this they would be allowing you to dictate some part of NWH actions in the universe, that's tricky ground.
You mention that this only affects some of the people that want to play this game, those that wanted to be Merc Corps and be affiliated with named canon Merc Units. While you are right that this does impact you, it also impacts others. I have a Davion sunburst next to my name, I am a member of the 1st Robinson Rangers (a canon house unit, though not a major one) and it effects me and my unit members every bit as much as you. We were planning on being a Merc Corp in game for purposes of unit structure control, we wanted to assign our own ranks and be part of a defined unit, not be at the whims of the house ranks and unit affiliations as described. Guess what we now can't use our name in game.
In fact, this being the case we, and others in our boat, have been adversely effected by design decisions twice now compared to the once of you and the other canon Merc Unit name users. First we had to drop the idea of being a House unit due to mechanics and find a work around by actually being mercs that only work for Davion (and maybe Steiner at times). Then we lost our name to this change. So your claim that everyone but canon Merc Unit devotees can have their cake while you are left out is a bit short sighted and thoughtless in light of what other members of this community may also have to deal with to get the experience they desire from this game.
Despite the mechanics and the changes we have found a way to move on and charge forward as a unit. So we can't be the 1st Robinson Rangers while in MWO, guess we'll be something else that fits our fancy and keeps true to our desire to be the 1RR. Out of game and in roleplay we will be whoever we choose as that is where it really matters. I feel no reason to get up in arms and bash the devs because they won't officially recognize in their game that we are the 1RR and take on all the canon based risk associated with that. I don't feel entitled to that.
I truly feel that the BT community is much better than what we have seen in the aftermath of this announcement. We should be showing maturity and sensibleness in understanding the devs reasons for doing this. We should understand that despitre some communications that got our hopes up (rightfully or not) they made a decision that was in the best interest in making the best game for all of us. Hey, and if that proves untrue when the game is released we can show our displeasure in more productive ways like not paying them.
I recognize that this post will probably mean little and do little good for those that feel slighted. This is just my opinions and I know yours and many others differ from mine. I feel I have said more than enough on this topic in the last 48 hours to leave it at that.
Edited by Bullwerk, 04 May 2012 - 06:31 PM.