Jump to content

Disagreeing With Mwo's Current Approach To Maps.


3 replies to this topic

#1 ice trey

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,523 posts
  • LocationFukushima, Japan

Posted 30 January 2013 - 03:33 PM

Hey guys.

So, we know that down the road, one of the defining things that the devs want to include in this game is the community warfare aspect, where players battle over different planets. I think this is a great idea.

However, think about that - Battling over planets - we're talking very different biomes for tens if not hundreds of worlds that they'll let us fight over. Some worlds may be lush and full of rainforests, while others may be harsh desert worlds, and others still devoid of atmosphere and exposed to the depths of space...

...but so far, the focus has been on really big, thought out maps. That's actually very fun to play on right now, but the rate at which they're being released is very slow, and they feel like areas that should be specific to one world, rather than templates that can be used for countless star systems.

I'd like to suggest that MWO start opting for more generic maps that can be cycled for each kind of world. For example, Forests 1 through 5, Lunar 1-3, Mesa Desert 1-5... that sort of thing. That way, based on the world terrain types specific to that planet can be randomized. For example, Tharkad might have Arctic Biomes, Alpine Biomes, (Coniferous) Forest Biomes, or Tundra Biomes - with one large urban map for "Endgame" battles, whereas a planet like Hesperus II might sport a knock-off of Caustic Valley, Desert Biomes, Mesa and Canyon biomes, and maybe since it's a very famous factory world, have a map set entirely in an underground industrial tunnel system.

So to re-iterate, the maps that we have now are fun - really fun - but I just don't think that having a tiny handful of maps will be appropriate when Community Warfare kicks in.

Edited by ice trey, 30 January 2013 - 03:33 PM.


#2 Stringburka

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Knight Errant
  • Knight Errant
  • 597 posts

Posted 30 January 2013 - 04:55 PM

I kind of agree with this. Having loads of different maps makes for more interesting gameplay, even if not every map is as detailed as they are now. Then again, I'm not that interested in visuals - for me, as long as the visuals are _adequate_ I don't care that much if they're just okay or if they're great. I still play MW4 on and off.

But yes, loads of lower-detail, maybe even randomized maps would be great. That way also, people can't really know exactly how a map looks, and thus scouting becomes more useful (you can tell your team "hey, there's a huge hill at d6, a deep river south of it" etc).

#3 Eddrick

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Storm
  • Storm
  • 1,493 posts
  • Facebook: Link
  • LocationCanyon Lake, TX.

Posted 30 January 2013 - 09:40 PM

View PostStringburka, on 30 January 2013 - 04:55 PM, said:

I kind of agree with this. Having loads of different maps makes for more interesting gameplay, even if not every map is as detailed as they are now. Then again, I'm not that interested in visuals - for me, as long as the visuals are _adequate_ I don't care that much if they're just okay or if they're great. I still play MW4 on and off.

Agree. Same here.

View PostStringburka, on 30 January 2013 - 04:55 PM, said:

But yes, loads of lower-detail, maybe even randomized maps would be great. That way also, people can't really know exactly how a map looks, and thus scouting becomes more useful (you can tell your team "hey, there's a huge hill at d6, a deep river south of it" etc).

!!! I love this idea! Random map generator please!

#4 Corvus Antaka

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Knight Errant
  • Knight Errant
  • 8,310 posts
  • Twitch: Link
  • LocationInner Sphere

Posted 30 January 2013 - 11:18 PM

Yeah especially after playing Crysis 2....I just dream of seeing THOSE maps in MWO, and the FPS performance too!!!

We need tons of maps imho, and bigger/more variety in maps in general.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users