62 replies to this topic

[Scratx]

I sniff a troll.

[Elizander]

I only usually get headshotted out of my Catapult and that's because I'm sometimes lazy and just stand in front of the enemy.

[Scratx]

Elizander, on 07 December 2012 - 11:28 PM, said:

I only usually get headshotted out of my Catapult and that's because I'm sometimes lazy and just stand in front of the enemy.

Oh, you're doing something wrong.

Edited by Scratx, 07 December 2012 - 11:28 PM.

[GalaxyBluestar]

headsot a hunchi once, but it was a stareoff competition XD

[Pendraco]

I am sorry. I know it can be frustrating being on the receiving end of a skilled team, but this entire thread should be destroyed by LRM's

[Rannos]

Well, hopefully its not behind cover, under ECM, has an AMS or is within 200 meters then! :v

[deadeye mcduck]

Without physical proof, it didnt happen.


Case closed

[Valder]

Cartman726, on 07 December 2012 - 11:23 PM, said:

Yes, I'm Cartman726



I don't know how to use photoshop.

Hey dude, liking all your own posts doesn't mean you're an asset to the community fyi.

[Gnuz]

"Physical proof". Really? :-)

..that amusement having been appreciated, ty, onto:

..not sure if troll or...

*shrugs*

"lots and lots of matches", only once so far have I had a "waaaaaidaminute that's was either an aimbot or or a 1 in ten million lucky shot" moment. Not saying they're not there, not saying they won't be there, just saying I cannot provide even heresay evidence, and granting the benefit of the doubt to "that guy". (whom I had the pleasure of chewing to bits later that same night.)

[TANTE EMMA]

we are actually not using aimbots, we are aimbots ... and lvl 10+ A.I.'s, geez, bad players are bad...

[RobinSage]

BEEEP.....BEEEP.....BEEEP......

Crap, I was gonna post but my BS detector is going off....sorry maybe next time.

[Elkarlo]

As i said: I found a Page about a Aimbot that seems to be compatible with MWO (didn't test it)
Found a Topic via Google on a Russian Side, but didn't crawl deeper in the Side as
those Sides are littered with virus and Hacking attacks.
And i don't need one, i need a good ping.

And personally i hate Aimbots and left ESL because of Aimbot users.
( Suddenly we were steamroled, before it was a close Match...)

Edited by Elkarlo, 08 December 2012 - 03:30 PM.

[Bishop Steiner]

Rannos, on 07 December 2012 - 10:41 PM, said:

That's literally impossible. Your cockpit has 18 armor with 18 internal health. A AC2 does, as the name suggests, 2 damage. There are no TACs (Through Armour Criticals) so there is no way such a weapon can one shot.
Please check your facts before blaming your terrible KDR on exploits.

pretty sure it's 18 armor with 3 internal. They said they didn't buff internal damage stats, and the head has always only had 3 points.

[stjobe]

Might want to take that name out Elkarlo, PGI aren't known for their lenience when it comes to talking about bots on the forums.

Bishop Steiner, on 08 December 2012 - 03:21 PM, said:

pretty sure it's 18 armor with 3 internal. They said they didn't buff internal damage stats, and the head has always only had 3 points.

Actually, it's 18 armour (max) and 15 points internal, 33 points in total.

Edited by stjobe, 08 December 2012 - 03:23 PM.

[Zero Neutral]

Rannos, on 07 December 2012 - 10:41 PM, said:

That's literally impossible. Your cockpit has 18 armor with 18 internal health. A AC2 does, as the name suggests, 2 damage. There are no TACs (Through Armour Criticals) so there is no way such a weapon can one shot.
Please check your facts before blaming your terrible KDR on exploits.

They fire quickly, so it might appear to be a one shot kill.

I haven't encountered any aim bots... or maybe I have and have not realized it.

[Kill3rAce]

Haha I actually got Headshoted today in my K2. I think I took 3 gauss rifles to the head the moment I popped over the ridge on the frozen man with my 8 man...we still recovered and won the match 8-3. So it can happen but their not hacking haha

[Secundus]

I'm not sure about hacks currently, but I wouldn't hold your breath for any sort of automated hack detection and banning system. They will relegate that to the player base to report it on a case by case basis, which is barely better than having nothing at all. Implementing a system is well beyond the capability of this team.

Edited by Secundus, 08 December 2012 - 03:25 PM.

[Zero Neutral]

Gnuz, on 08 December 2012 - 02:22 AM, said:

"Physical proof". Really? :-)

..that amusement having been appreciated, ty, onto:

..not sure if troll or...

*shrugs*

"lots and lots of matches", only once so far have I had a "waaaaaidaminute that's was either an aimbot or or a 1 in ten million lucky shot" moment. Not saying they're not there, not saying they won't be there, just saying I cannot provide even heresay evidence, and granting the benefit of the doubt to "that guy". (whom I had the pleasure of chewing to bits later that same night.)

I'm in that boat too.

Secundus, on 08 December 2012 - 03:25 PM, said:

I'm not sure about hacks currently, but I wouldn't hold your breath for any sort of automated hack detection and banning system. They will relegate that to the player base to report it on a case by case basis, which is barely better than having nothing at all. Implementing a system is well beyond the capability of this team.

I disagree, I think that they are moving in the direction to implement some automated protections.

[Tickdoff Tank]

Bishop Steiner, on 08 December 2012 - 03:21 PM, said:

pretty sure it's 18 armor with 3 internal. They said they didn't buff internal damage stats, and the head has always only had 3 points.

15 internal for the head.

[Irreverence]

Sometimes if you time it well a D-DC can alpha a light mech at full speed and kill it, provided you get through the lagstuff.