Jump to content

Ecm Too All Encompassing.

Started by FrupertApricot, Dec 07 2012 11:31 PM

No replies to this topic

Poll: Which ECM factors would you prefer (8 member(s) have cast votes)

Should ECM be offensive or Defensive or both as it is now.

  1. offensive (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  2. Defensive (5 votes [62.50%])

    Percentage of vote: 62.50%

  3. Both (3 votes [37.50%])

    Percentage of vote: 37.50%

Would you be okay with locks still being possbile within ECM effect but at 2x or 3x etc. lock on times?

  1. yep (6 votes [75.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 75.00%

  2. nope (2 votes [25.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 25.00%

Do you think that BAP should let the mech carrying it ignore ECM?

  1. Yes (3 votes [37.50%])

    Percentage of vote: 37.50%

  2. No (3 votes [37.50%])

    Percentage of vote: 37.50%

  3. Within X range (2 votes [25.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 25.00%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 FrupertApricot

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • 669 posts

Posted 07 December 2012 - 11:31 PM

ECM was never meant to counter standard munitions like regular LRM racks or basic targeting. IT is curently a single item EWAR suite. If in tabletop the ECM provided the kind of benefits it does in MWO it would weigh about 250 tons and be equippably only on dropships.

ECM should half the sensor range of ENEMIES within its reach, and double lock on times for weapons. Bamf. done. Balanced. Fun. Worth using but not overwhelming for 1.5 tons. Seriously who is goign to use a ******* BAP at this rate?
Back to Archive · Next Unread Topic →


1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users