Mechwarrior Buddah, on 12 December 2012 - 10:48 AM, said:
Contradiction: being in a open beta and being denied actual double heat sinks "because we say so" rather than letting us test them
To be fair, that's not accurate.
Deciding to not have X in a product because "we don't want X in the product" is a perfectly valid design decision. Whether it's the CORRECT decision is an entire other discussion; it is still a valid decision. Once that high-level decision has been made, testing X is pointless, because the results of the test are irrelevant. The decision isn't being made based on that, and it certainly doesn't need to be "ratified" by the testers. If they have decided that X will not happen, putting it out for the testers is a waste of time.
This isn't a democracy. It is a dictatorship. Businesses may choose (choose being the operative word) to listen to their consumers because it is generally in their best interests to do so, but it is by no means a "right" to have us sign off on their design choices. The only "vote" we have that carries any weight beyond the weight the company deigns to give it is the one w/our wallets.
Edited by SteelPaladin, 12 December 2012 - 11:08 AM.