

Hawken Has "mechs"?
Started by Namwons, Dec 13 2012 11:42 AM
12 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 13 December 2012 - 11:42 AM
I thought "mechs" were a copywrite of the Mechwarrior franchise. Wouldnt it be illegal to use this term in there game? Im just wondering btw?
#2
Posted 13 December 2012 - 11:44 AM
Depends on if they are called BATTLEmechs or not.
#3
Posted 13 December 2012 - 11:45 AM
Mech is an abbreviated word:mechanized. It is often used, and is not reserved(or even used first by) mechwarriors. As Joseph above me said, if you get more specific and say battlemechs or battletech, that's another story.
Edited by Walk, 13 December 2012 - 11:46 AM.
#4
Posted 13 December 2012 - 11:46 AM
Indeed, trashcans would be a better term for those walking abominations, but then it would offend the Urbie.
#5
Posted 13 December 2012 - 11:55 AM
Only thing keeping me from playing hawken is that their Mech designs are hideous, but it probably has everything to do with copyright and if MS and Harmony Gold don't own the rights, then Bandai does.
#7
Posted 13 December 2012 - 11:57 AM
There are MECHanical pew pew machines in that game, yes. Are they Battlemechs, not by a long shot.
#8
Posted 13 December 2012 - 11:58 AM
Slightly larger exosuits
#9
Posted 13 December 2012 - 12:02 PM
As much as I like the feel and vibe of Hawken, those mechs are terrible looking.
I know the whole idea is they are supposed to be assembled from parts (sort of Frankenstein'd together), but not a single variant I seen looks descent.
P.S. most companies seem to avoid using the term "Mech" so it seems. I know Earthseige called them "Hercs" and Front Mission calls them "Wanzers". I think most companies try and play it safe by calling mechs something else.
I know the whole idea is they are supposed to be assembled from parts (sort of Frankenstein'd together), but not a single variant I seen looks descent.
P.S. most companies seem to avoid using the term "Mech" so it seems. I know Earthseige called them "Hercs" and Front Mission calls them "Wanzers". I think most companies try and play it safe by calling mechs something else.
#10
Posted 13 December 2012 - 12:07 PM
For the record: You can't have copyrights on a word. Copyrights refer to the right to copy and reproduce, and if you could have copyright on a word no one could write it without prior permission.
You can trademark words though, which is the rights to sell a certain category of products under a particular label. Trademarks can be lost though general adoption, and it's possible this has happened to Mech if the term was ever trademarked at all that is. I think it happened to Rollerblades.
Copy-writing is something else entirely.
You can trademark words though, which is the rights to sell a certain category of products under a particular label. Trademarks can be lost though general adoption, and it's possible this has happened to Mech if the term was ever trademarked at all that is. I think it happened to Rollerblades.
Copy-writing is something else entirely.
#11
Posted 13 December 2012 - 01:00 PM
FASA has (or had...) 'Mech trademarked - notice the apostraphe. For reference, here's Sarna's download of the old Davion housebook; there is a trademark notice at the bottom of page six: http://sarna.s3.amaz...ouse_davion.pdf
#12
Posted 13 December 2012 - 01:01 PM
I like the TV mech.
I named mine Philips.
I named mine Philips.
#13
Posted 13 December 2012 - 01:40 PM
actually i tried hawken for 10 minutes...and no...they don´t have mechs, they have ugly as hell bunches of scrap metal...
there is actually only 1 of those "omg take this off my FoV" protomechs that i´d consider "okay"...
btw..i hate the gameplay, just as i thought^^ and UE3....well it had it´s days i guess
there is actually only 1 of those "omg take this off my FoV" protomechs that i´d consider "okay"...
btw..i hate the gameplay, just as i thought^^ and UE3....well it had it´s days i guess

Edited by Adrienne Vorton, 13 December 2012 - 02:11 PM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users