

Some Little Icon To Prevent Being Called A Freeloader?
#21
Posted 17 December 2012 - 08:53 AM
#22
Posted 17 December 2012 - 09:35 AM
MadPanda, on 17 December 2012 - 01:21 AM, said:
Did you wake up on the wrong side of bed? Looks like you are reading a bit much into my post. Which part of my post really made me look like an "elitist"? The part where I calmly pointed out that trial players are often called as "trial noobs" by others? Or the part where I pointed out that you can't see ones founder/lonewolf status in game? You are a big jerk, good day to you.
Ask and it will be answered:
MadPanda, on 15 December 2012 - 03:52 PM, said:
There is no "other" mentioned in that statement. This implies that you yourself are stating it (implied I). If you intended to put the phrase "by others" at the end then perhaps you should proofread a bit more before posting (or use the edit function).
Quote
Given the tone of this part, it is not hard to fathom that you are saying trial mech users are freeloaders.
Also, given the fact this is a new user and you are responding as if you are a complete jackass, I think the notion of "jerk" could also be placed in your court.
Good day to you sir.
#23
Posted 17 December 2012 - 09:52 AM
Willie Sauerland, on 17 December 2012 - 09:35 AM, said:
Ask and it will be answered:
There is no "other" mentioned in that statement. This implies that you yourself are stating it (implied I). If you intended to put the phrase "by others" at the end then perhaps you should proofread a bit more before posting (or use the edit function).
There doesn't need to be "other" mentioned. The hint is in the "you will be called". There is no implication that it is me who is doing the name calling. Like I already said, you are reading too much into my post. You are making a wrong assumption. You cannot come here and tell me what I meant. I know better what I meant because I wrote it. You are in the wrong. Do not even try to argue this.
Willie Sauerland, on 17 December 2012 - 09:35 AM, said:
Given the tone? Oh, it's you reading into things again. Why am I not surprised that your whole "you are an elitist" argument was based on false readings and your own false assumptions. This conversation is over. You are a jerk. Good day to you sir.
#24
Posted 17 December 2012 - 10:38 AM
I think that has to be a "Bug" in the coding...

Edited by MaddMaxx, 17 December 2012 - 10:39 AM.
#25
Posted 17 December 2012 - 10:59 AM
Put your money where you mouth is and kick some ***. This game is about pawning mechs. Not showing flashy mech paint, although at 250 MC per color, PGI would have you think so. If someone is REALLY overly abusive, screenshot and report.
Otherwise, lock and load and watch them laugh from the grave.
#26
Posted 17 December 2012 - 12:49 PM
Smeghead87, on 16 December 2012 - 12:55 AM, said:
Who says I have spent it all, I bought a few mechs, did a few other fun things, and saving a lot up for future hero mechs or whatever comes our way, but the money's out of my bank account either way of course. And a trial mech is - if I have a bad night and am playing like a wet blanket - even more profitable than a fully tricked out owned mech that keeps ending up destroyed. Even so, who cares, if I want to run in a trial mech, I do, I should not be cursed at for that reason.
Velba, on 16 December 2012 - 01:01 AM, said:
It's not like I am gonna cry about being called names, I have been called far far worse, and am being called far worse on a daily basis. but I AM used to a much better overal decorum within the community for the games my employer has released (I work for a software/game dev in my country), and within the other communities I'm a part of.
Valten, on 16 December 2012 - 02:08 PM, said:
There's nothing you can do about it, each person is responsible for his or her own behaviour, but thanks very much all the same!

Willie Sauerland, on 16 December 2012 - 06:59 PM, said:

If you see me in game (I'm horrible with names) give me a shout out.

Thanks very much, will do, I shall keep a look out!

pjnt, on 17 December 2012 - 10:59 AM, said:
This is exactly the kind of behaviour I mean. I am not looking to be 'special'. What is special about spending money? I am saying, why do people in this community seem to be attacking each other so much based on spending money at a certain time, or not spending money at all? And I suggested one little way that might prevent a few cases... but I get more flames than proper feedback. You are a good example again too. I don't care about status, I care about a nice gaming experience with nice folks without the same kind of things that have driven me from so many mainstream fps games in the past.
But think what you like, it's a free web.
-----
Regards,
Fred
Edited by MadFred26, 17 December 2012 - 12:52 PM.
#27
Posted 17 December 2012 - 01:10 PM
#28
Posted 17 December 2012 - 02:57 PM
Comassion, on 17 December 2012 - 01:10 PM, said:
Agreed. (but I'd like them to fix bugs before working on more new content)
*EDIT*
Also, I don't give a flying [censored] how much someone has spent on a game. I only treat them like an a**hole if they act like one. (This includes, but is not limited to: constant 'friendly fire', suiciding, and trolling. I also ignore the trolls. But I don't mind if my lasers track across them as much as I would if I hit a helpful teammate.)
Edited by Spirit of the Wolf, 17 December 2012 - 03:01 PM.
#29
Posted 18 December 2012 - 02:41 PM
MadPanda, on 17 December 2012 - 09:52 AM, said:
There doesn't need to be "other" mentioned. The hint is in the "you will be called". There is no implication that it is me who is doing the name calling. Like I already said, you are reading too much into my post. You are making a wrong assumption. You cannot come here and tell me what I meant. I know better what I meant because I wrote it. You are in the wrong. Do not even try to argue this.
Given the tone? Oh, it's you reading into things again. Why am I not surprised that your whole "you are an elitist" argument was based on false readings and your own false assumptions. This conversation is over. You are a jerk. Good day to you sir.
Suggestion: Write what you mean clearly since I or others cannot communicate with you in person to know how you truly mean something. I was not the only one who thought this - several others I know thought it as well. Therefore, I am not alone in my (mis?)interpretation.
Sure - I can't tell you what you mean, but I certainly can tell you how you came across. As for reading into your post, no - I was reading your post as written. I can't help the fact it wasn't clearly written to express what you were wanting to say...
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users