Jump to content

plasma/lightning weapons


21 replies to this topic

#21 IMAZOMBIE

    Member

  • Pip
  • 18 posts

Posted 19 May 2012 - 06:20 AM

View PostMason West, on 18 May 2012 - 03:10 PM, said:

I have heard of the novels and want to start reading them.

if you do start reading them, the first half of the first book covers a lot of political stuff and history. the action scenes are pretty good but they are short. im reading it via kindle and its pretty good. i thought battletech/mechwarrior was all huge mechs and epic explosions...nope. theres a whole slew of strings and cables attached and a lot undercover buisness too which make it a really good book if your into spy missions. its....a bit like 007 in a mechwarrior universe.

#22 Strum Wealh

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Raider
  • The Raider
  • 5,025 posts
  • LocationPittsburgh, PA

Posted 20 May 2012 - 07:42 AM

As previously mentioned, BT/MW PPCs are more of the "classic sci-fi raygun" style of charged particle cannons whose salvos are described as "cerulean arcs/bolts of man-made lightning".
Given such a weapon's vulnerability to the effects of blooming and beam absorption (both caused by interaction with the atmosphere), use of a "laser-induced plasma channel" (as would be the case with an "electrolaser") is one possible solution.

A BT/MW Plasma Rifle (developed by the Capellans as a man-portable version in 3065, an IS BattleMech-scale version in 3068, and a Clan BattleMech-scale version in 3069), on the other hand, uses a lasing chamber to convert a solid fuel (a cartridge of foam or plastic) into plasma and project it (via magnetic fields) as a stream or bolt from the weapon (giving the weapon a more "fire-like" appearance as opposed to the "lightning-like" appearance of the PPCs, IMO), similar to the real-life experimental equipment used in the Shiva Star and MARAUDER programs.
As such, Plasma Rifles are technically also "charged particle cannons", but of a rather different and less "classic sci-fi raygun" type than the PPCs.

IMO, part of the distinction would be which damage mechanisms are emphasized - the PPCs inflict damage primarily from kinetic energy, secondarily through electrical interference, and finally through heat transfer, while the Plasma Rifles inflict damage through heat transfer, secondarily through kinetic energy, and finally through some limited electrical interference (as highly-charged gas and magnetic fields are still involved).

Your thoughts?





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users